<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-12T18:36:16Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34074152" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34074152</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-05T17:57:30Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_4</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_13</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_14</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_24</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_931</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_64</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_132</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_134</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_10_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Evaluation of Phred score calibration methods on variant calling accuracy on mixed plasmid datasets (R9.4.1), comparison of scalar reduction versus curve-fitting approaches (quadratic, polynomial, Gaussian) derived from QvQ plots of clonal plasmids. Only scalar methods resulted in precisions of 100% while scalar minus 5 provided optimal balance between precision and recall (F1: 76.2).&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Xavier Zair (25317383)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Andreas Wilm (7951)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Miles C. Benton (9601012)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Cheng Yong Tham (8528523)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Lin Yang (45852)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Paola Florez de Sessions (9048782)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>October Michael Sessions (6635093)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Eng Hui Chew (25317386)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Swapnil Mishra (8611860)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biochemistry</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Genetics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Molecular Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Evolutionary Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Information Systems not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cancer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Infectious Diseases</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Virology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>widely used caller</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>tracking viral evolution</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sequenced using r9</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>oxford nanopore technologies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>false discovery rates</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>benchmarked across chemistries</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>consensus variant calling</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>lofreq &amp;# 8217</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt; next</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>1 flow cells</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt; lofreq</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt;</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>consensus variants</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>study assesses</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>short reads</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>library sizes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>less effective</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>haploid genomes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>generation sequencing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>effective sequencing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>detecting variants</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>best performance</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>also introduced</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>7179 bases</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>100 snvs</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Evaluation of Phred score calibration methods on variant calling accuracy on mixed plasmid datasets (R9.4.1), comparison of scalar reduction versus curve-fitting approaches (quadratic, polynomial, Gaussian) derived from QvQ plots of clonal plasmids. Only scalar methods resulted in precisions of 100% while scalar minus 5 provided optimal balance between precision and recall (F1: 76.2).&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-10-05T17:57:18Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0356259.t002</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Evaluation_of_Phred_score_calibration_methods_on_variant_calling_accuracy_on_mixed_plasmid_datasets_R9_4_1_comparison_of_scalar_reduction_versus_curve-fitting_approaches_quadratic_polynomial_Gaussian_derived_from_QvQ_plots_of_clonal_plas/34074152</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
