<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-06T06:19:18Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34054614" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34054614</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-02T05:37:38Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_450</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_316</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_10_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Supplementary file 1_Explainable AI for phishing URL detection: a Bayesian-optimized stacking ensemble framework with SHAP-guided feature learning.zip</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Hafiz Aziz Khan (25162683)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sonia Akter (6656819)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Abdur Rahman Lindon (25162686)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Taslima Akter (14841771)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Iftekhar Rasul (25162689)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Mamunur Rahman (14947036)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Nasrin Akter Tohfa (25162692)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Iftekhar Hossain (25162695)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Knowledge Representation and Machine Learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Bayesian optimization</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>CatBoost</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cybersecurity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ensemble learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>explainable AI</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>feature selection</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>machine learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>organizational resilience</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Introduction&lt;p&gt;Phishing remains one of the most persistent and financially damaging threats facing modern organizations, with over 4.7 million incidents recorded in 2023 alone. Existing AI-based phishing detection frameworks are constrained by limited benchmarking scope, absent model interpretability, and insufficient statistical validation — three limitations that collectively restrict operational utility in real-world security environments.&lt;/p&gt;Methods&lt;p&gt;We present an explainable, end-to-end machine learning pipeline evaluated on a large public benchmark of 247,950 URLs described by 41 structural and lexical features. The pipeline integrates SHAP-driven feature selection (reducing 41 to 24 features via a 95% cumulative-signal rule), a systematic benchmark of 12 classifiers spanning seven algorithmic families, Bayesian hyperparameter optimization via Optuna TPE sampling (40 trials each for XGBoost and CatBoost), and a heterogeneous stacking ensemble combining Optuna-tuned XGBoost, CatBoost, Extra Trees, and Random Forest under a logistic-regression meta-learner. A four-layer statistical validation protocol — comprising a Friedman omnibus test, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, paired t-tests, and Cohen's d effect sizes — was applied to five-fold cross-validation accuracy distributions to assess directional consistency, with the limited inferential resolution of five folds explicitly acknowledged.&lt;/p&gt;Results&lt;p&gt;SHAP-driven selection reduced the feature space by 41.5% while retaining 95% of predictive signal. The stacking ensemble achieved 96.75% accuracy, 96.74% F1-score, and AUC of 0.9947, attaining the lowest Brier score among all 13 models (0.0246), indicating superior probability calibration. The Friedman omnibus test confirmed significant performance differences across models (χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;F = 59.84, p &lt; 0.0001), and all 12 Wilcoxon pairwise comparisons yielded the minimum attainable p-value (p = 0.0313), confirming the ensemble never lost a cross-validation fold against any baseline. Post-hoc SHAP analysis identified subdomain structure, URL length, and URL entropy as the dominant phishing indicators at both ensemble and base-learner levels.&lt;/p&gt;Discussion&lt;p&gt;The co-leaders — the stacking ensemble and Extra Trees — demonstrate that rigorous, interpretable AI pipelines can advance phishing detection accuracy and transparency simultaneously. The framework's calibrated risk scores, threshold flexibility, and multi-level SHAP explainability support analyst-facing decision-making in security operations, while its leakage-free&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-10-02T05:37:38Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.3389/frai.2026.1854934.s001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Supplementary_file_1_Explainable_AI_for_phishing_URL_detection_a_Bayesian-optimized_stacking_ensemble_framework_with_SHAP-guided_feature_learning_zip/34054614</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
