<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T06:10:00Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34048689" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34048689</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-10T20:28:18Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_30355</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_10_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Use of a genetic algorithm approach for improving precision and efficiency of tests for estimating premorbid cognitive ability</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Peter Bright (16695954)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Lewis Horsman (16664259)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ian van der Linde (15476366)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Clinical neuropsychology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>premorbid ability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>neuropsychological testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>National Adult Reading Test (NART)</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>genetic algorithm</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Spot-the-word Test</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Origin:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Poster presented at the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco, CA, USA, 23–26 April 2022.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Abstract:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;The 50-item National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson, 1982; NART–R; Nelson &amp; Willison, 1991), first published in the UK in 1982, remains a widely used method for estimating premorbid intelligence in neurological patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;We recently restandardised the NART against the most recent revision of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV; Bright et al., 2018) and have confirmed the utility of the NART and other tests based on oral reading in the estimation of premorbid full-scale IQ (FSIQ) in a range of neurological conditions (Bright et al., 2002; Bright et al., 2020). Nevertheless, such tests may contain words that provide little or no diagnostic power (i.e., can be eliminated without negatively affecting prediction accuracy). We recently proposed a genetic algorithm (GA)-based method (see Box 1) that tackles the computationally intractable problem of identifying optimal subsets of words from premorbid IQ word-reading tests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Using this method we identified a subset of 17 of the original 50 NART words that predict FSIQ as accurately as the entire test (van der Linde &amp; Bright, 2018). Abbreviated tests have multiple benefits: they reduce the burden on patients and clinicians, help to ameliorate fatigue effects, reduce anxiety and embarrassment for low-scoring participants and potentially reduce the exposure of patients to clinicians at a time of increased caution due to Covid-19.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;In Study 1 we:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;1. Ran a confirmatory analysis on predictive precision of the 17-item NART subset using a new cohort of participants and compared predictive accuracy of the NART to Spot-the-Word 2 (STW-2; Baddeley &amp; Crawford, 2012)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;2. Applied our GA procedure to the STW-2 to determine whether an abbreviated version of this test might similarly offer equivalent or enhanced precision in the estimation of WAIS-IV full-scale IQ.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;In Study 2 we:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;3. Identified an optimal subset of TOPF stimuli using our GA method and ran a confirmatory analysis in an independent cohort of participants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;References:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Baddeley, A., &amp; Crawford, J. (2012). &lt;i&gt;Spot the word&lt;/i&gt; (2nd ed.). Pearson.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Bright, P., Hale, E., Gooch, V. J., Myhill, T., &amp; van der Linde, I. (2018). The National Adult Reading Test: Restandardisation against the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth edition. &lt;i&gt;Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28&lt;/i&gt;(6), 1019–1027. &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2016.1231121" target="_blank"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2016.1231121&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Bright, P., &amp; van der Linde, I. (2020). Comparison of methods for estimating premorbid intelligence. &lt;i&gt;Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30&lt;/i&gt;(1), 1–14. &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2018.1445650" target="_blank"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2018.1445650&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Nelson, H. E. (1982). &lt;i&gt;National Adult Reading Test (NART): For the assessment of premorbid intelligence in patients with dementia: Test manual&lt;/i&gt;. NFER-Nelson.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Nelson, H. E., &amp; Willison, J. (1991). &lt;i&gt;National Adult Reading Test (NART).&lt;/i&gt; NFER-Nelson.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;van der Linde, I., &amp; Bright, P. (2018). A genetic algorithm to find optimal reading test word subsets for estimating full-scale IQ. &lt;i&gt;PLOS ONE, 13&lt;/i&gt;(10), e0205754. &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205754" target="_blank"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205754&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;van der Linde, I., Horsman, L., &amp; Bright, P. (2022). The validity of abbreviated forms of the National Adult Reading Test and Spot-the-Word 2 for estimating full-scale IQ. &lt;i&gt;Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 32&lt;/i&gt;(10), 2534–2543. &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2021.1958874" target="_blank"&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2021.1958874&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Wechsler, D. (2008). &lt;i&gt;Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale&lt;/i&gt; (4th ed.). Pearson Assessment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Wechsler, D. (2011). &lt;i&gt;Test of Premorbid Functioning: UK version (TOPF-UK).&lt;/i&gt; Pearson Assessment.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-10-10T20:28:18Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Image</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Poster</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.6084/m9.figshare.34048689.v2</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/poster/Use_of_a_genetic_algorithm_approach_for_improving_precision_and_efficiency_of_tests_for_estimating_premorbid_cognitive_ability/34048689</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
