<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-06T14:17:16Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34040490" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34040490</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-01T06:16:23Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_26539</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_26461</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_26470</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_12</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_10_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Multi-constraint LV cable selection: a review-oriented algorithm from tabulated ampacity to a complete design decision</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Buchinskii, Evgenii (25153638)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Engineering practice</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Electrical circuits and systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Electrical energy transmission, networks and systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>LV cable selection</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>IEC 60364</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ampacity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>voltage drop</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>overcurrent protection</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>short-circuit withstand</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>earth-fault loop</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>governing constraint</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Low-voltage cable selection is often treated as an ampacity problem, although a final cable size is the result of several independent constraints. A cable may satisfy current-carrying capacity and still fail protective-device coordination, voltage drop, short-circuit thermal withstand, automatic disconnection under the minimum fault current, or conductor-specific requirements. This report presents a review-oriented workflow that treats each criterion as a separate lower bound on conductor size, identifies the largest lower bound, then performs a closing verification on the selected standard size. The method does not introduce new normative equations; its contribution is the ordering, integration and reporting of established checks so that the reason for the selected section remains visible. A worked 400 V three-phase feeder demonstrates the method using a synthetic but fully reproducible project dataset. Ampacity and overload coordination permit a 70 mm² copper phase conductor, short-circuit thermal withstand requires 95 mm², and voltage drop requires 120 mm²; the selected 120 mm² conductor therefore passes because the voltage-drop criterion governs. Sensitivity checks show how the governing criterion changes with route length and fault-clearing time. The method is intended for design calculations, cable schedules and review tools where the final section must be traceable to the constraint that actually forced it.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-10-01T06:16:23Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Preprint</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.6084/m9.figshare.34040490.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Multi-constraint_LV_cable_selection_a_review-oriented_algorithm_from_tabulated_ampacity_to_a_complete_design_decision/34040490</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
