<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-11T19:39:10Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34039287" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34039287</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-01T05:31:37Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_173</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_316</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_10_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Supplementary file 1_AI feedback-seeking and learning engagement in art education: psychological antecedents and reflective mechanisms.docx</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Tianbi Hu (25152675)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Guangyao Li (428714)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Applied Psychology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>AI feedback-seeking</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>art education</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>fear of negative evaluation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>help-seeking avoidance</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>openness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reflective learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>task behavioral engagement</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Introduction&lt;p&gt;Generative artificial intelligence provides students with a feedback source that differs from traditional teacher and peer interaction, yet limited research has explained why students actively seek feedback from AI or how such feedback-seeking is associated with subsequent learning engagement. Drawing on transactional stress and coping theory and social cognitive theory, this study examined the psychological antecedents and reflective mechanisms of AI feedback-seeking in art education.&lt;/p&gt;Methods&lt;p&gt;Two complementary studies were conducted. Study 1 utilized survey data from 315 higher education students with recent experience in art learning and generative AI use to investigate whether a fear of negative evaluation was associated with AI feedback-seeking through interpersonal help-seeking avoidance. Study 2 involved 172 students who completed a standardized AI-supported art-creation task. It examined whether AI feedback-seeking was associated with task behavioral engagement through reflective learning and whether openness strengthened this indirect relationship. The proposed relationships were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling.&lt;/p&gt;Results&lt;p&gt;In Study 1, fear of negative evaluation was positively associated with interpersonal help-seeking avoidance, which in turn was associated with greater AI feedback-seeking. The indirect association between fear of negative evaluation and AI feedback-seeking through interpersonal help-seeking avoidance was significant, whereas the direct association was not. In Study 2, AI feedback-seeking was positively associated with reflective learning, which was further associated with task behavioral engagement. Reflective learning significantly mediated the association between AI feedback-seeking and task behavioral engagement. Openness strengthened both the association between AI feedback-seeking and reflective learning and the corresponding indirect association with task behavioral engagement.&lt;/p&gt;Discussion&lt;p&gt;The findings indicate that avoiding interpersonal help does not necessarily reflect withdrawal from feedback. Under evaluation concerns, students may instead select AI as a feedback source involving less interpersonal exposure. However, seeking AI feedback is not uniformly associated with stronger learning engagement; its relevance depends on whether students reflect on the information obtained and remain receptive to alternative perspectives. The study positions AI feedback-seeking as both a coping-oriented form of feedback-source selection and a learner-initiated resource for reflective engagement in art education.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-10-01T05:31:37Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1948880.s001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Supplementary_file_1_AI_feedback-seeking_and_learning_engagement_in_art_education_psychological_antecedents_and_reflective_mechanisms_docx/34039287</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
