2026-10-10T17:02:37Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/34038783 2026-10-01T04:39:00Z category_388 portal_316 item_type_1 month_year_10_2026

Image 4_Resection rates after conversion therapy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.tif Xiaobo Ouyang (25152105) Ji Li (207201) Po Liang (25152108) Yanfei Wang (513529) Yangming Liu (12254459) Zhuoren Cheng (25152111) Ping Che (1945648) Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified conversion therapy hepatectomy hepatocellular carcinoma initially unresectable HCC liver resection meta-analysis systematic review Introduction<p>Conversion therapy may create an opportunity for liver resection in selected patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but reported conversion rates use heterogeneous denominators and endpoints. We estimated actual completed hepatectomy using a verified all-treated denominator.</p>Methods<p>PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library/CENTRAL, Wanfang Data, and CNKI were searched through April 10, 2026. Eligible cohorts included initially or baseline unresectable HCC, an all-treated denominator, and completed liver resection events. Two authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Random-effects logit proportion meta-analysis, Hartung-Knapp sensitivity, prediction intervals, leave-one-out analyses, treatment-strategy subgroups, publication-year meta-regression, and small-study-effect diagnostics were undertaken. PROSPERO: CRD420261360108.</p>Results<p>Thirty-seven reports represented 36 unique studies; 34 studies involving 5,137 patients and 1,042 completed hepatectomies entered the quantitative synthesis. The crude aggregate resection rate was 20.3% (1,042/5,137), whereas the random-effects modeled pooled rate was 25.40% (95% CI, 20.74%-30.69%; I²=91.5%; tau²=0.5132). The Hartung-Knapp 95% CI was 20.12%-31.51%, and the prediction interval was 7.16%-60.04%. Leave-one-out estimates ranged from 24.52% to 26.64%. Treatment-strategy differences were not statistically significant (Qm=5.17, df=2, P = 0.075). Publication-year meta-regression did not show a clear linear association (OR per decade 1.19, 95% CI 0.77-1.83; P = 0.440), and Egger’s test did not indicate significant funnel asymmetry (P = 0.381).</p>Conclusions<p>Approximately one-quarter of patients initiating conversion therapy underwent actual hepatectomy, but the crude and modeled estimates differ because substantial heterogeneity changes random-effects study weighting. The pooled estimate is a cross-study, cross-era benchmark for multidisciplinary decision-making rather than a universal patient-level probability or a treatment-specific efficacy estimate.</p>Systematic Review Registration<p>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261360108.</p> 2026-10-01T04:39:00Z Image Figure 10.3389/fonc.2026.1898480 https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Image_4_Resection_rates_after_conversion_therapy_for_initially_unresectable_hepatocellular_carcinoma_a_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis_tif/34038783 CC BY 4.0