<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-09T17:12:54Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34038044" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34038044</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-01T04:11:15Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_7</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_19</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_873</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_61</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_64</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_63</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_6</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_10_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Photoinitiated Radical
Thiol–Ene/Methacrylate
versus Thia-Michael Addition in Polyurethane-Grafted Networks: A Comparative
Study of Polymeric Drug Delivery Platforms</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Amita Santra (18262309)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Souvik Debnath (20552111)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Alaka T. Panicker (25151543)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kaushik Chatterjee (1452559)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Pralay Maiti (1611559)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Medicine</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Pharmacology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Developmental Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cancer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>tuning backbone chemistry</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>providing fresh hope</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>greater thiol conversion</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>evaluating anticancer efficacy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>dynamic shear rheology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>combine therapeutic functionality</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>biomedical practice necessitates</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>alamarblue alongside ros</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>advanced healthcare applications</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>homogeneous network compared</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>advanced polymer science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cancer cell mortality</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>1 &lt;/ sup</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>methacrylate versus thia</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>especially cancer treatment</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>methacrylate reaction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>grafted network</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>based polymer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>thermoplastic behavior</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>subtle variations</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>subsequently grafted</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>structural analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>state viscoelasticity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>results show</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>regenerative medicine</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>practical outcomes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>photoinitiated approach</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>nuanced comprehension</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>next generation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>molecular precision</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>michael addition</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>integrative approach</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>highly cross</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>h nmr</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>grafted networks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>engineered biomaterials</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>comprehensive comparison</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>complex diseases</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>comparative study</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>catalyzed thia</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>biomaterial platforms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>biological interactions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>better predictive</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>adaptable chemistries</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>8 %).</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>72 h</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>5 %)</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>3 assays</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>231 cells</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>In the age of advanced polymer science and regenerative
medicine,
biomaterial platforms are being developed that combine therapeutic
functionality and molecular precision, providing fresh hope for the
treatment of complex diseases, such as cancer. Translating these adaptable
chemistries into biomedical practice necessitates a nuanced comprehension
of how subtle variations in network formation mechanisms affect the
practical outcomes. Herein, copolymers were synthesized using a base-catalyzed
thia-Michael addition and a photoinitiated radical thiol–ene/methacrylate
reaction, respectively, and subsequently grafted with polyurethane
to yield corresponding grafted copolymers. A comprehensive comparison
was carried out using &lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;H NMR and GPC for structural analysis,
dynamic shear rheology for melt-state viscoelasticity, and alamarBlue
alongside ROS and caspase-3 assays for evaluating anticancer efficacy
against MDA-MB-231 cells. Results show that the base-initiated click
reaction yielded a greater thiol conversion (47.5%) and a more homogeneous
network compared to the photoinitiated approach (22.8%). While both
graft copolymers exhibited significant shear thinning and thermoplastic
behavior, the highly cross-linked photo-based polymer (Graft-P) showed
a greater steady shear viscosity. Ultimately, the thia-Michael polyurethane-grafted
network (Graft-C) with tailored hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance
provided better sustained paclitaxel release, resulting in about 70%
cancer cell mortality over 72 h as opposed to 55% for the photo-based
grafted polymer network. Through this integrative approach, we demonstrate
how tuning backbone chemistry and postsynthetic grafting drives functional
performance and shape the next generation of engineered biomaterials:
more resilient, tunable, and better predictive in their biological
interactions, well-suited for advanced healthcare applications, especially
cancer treatment.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Journal contribution</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1021/acsapm.6c02793.s001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Photoinitiated_Radical_Thiol_Ene_Methacrylate_versus_Thia-Michael_Addition_in_Polyurethane-Grafted_Networks_A_Comparative_Study_of_Polymeric_Drug_Delivery_Platforms/34038044</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
