<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-06T23:58:58Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34037640" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34037640</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-01T01:43:28Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_35888</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_32819</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_32816</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_32894</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_234</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_24</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_10_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>OER Editor Review Template (compact version)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>La Trobe eBureau (6051627)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Open access</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Curriculum and pedagogy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Education</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Higher education</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>OER</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>template</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>open educational resources</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>OEP</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>open educational practices</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;This template (compact version) supports La Trobe eBureau editors to review chapter outlines and full draft chapters for an open educational resource (OER). It helps editors identify what is working, what needs attention, and what should happen next so authors can move forward with clear, practical guidance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;This compact version of the template is intended for editors who find the &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.26181/32943482" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"&gt;comprehensive version&lt;/a&gt; to be too systematic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;This review template is based on the eBureau’s &lt;a href="https://www.latrobe.edu.au/library/ebureau/work-with-us/oer-content-quality-rubric" target="_blank"&gt;OER Content Quality Rubric&lt;/a&gt;. It adapts the rubric’s full 12 domains into eight compact domains tailored for the editor review process.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-10-01T01:43:28Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Workflow</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.26181/34037640.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/workflow/OER_Editor_Review_Template_compact_version_/34037640</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
