<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-12T20:23:13Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34037495" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34037495</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-10-01T01:07:14Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_14</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_272</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_63</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_6</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_10_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Techno-Economic
Analysis of Low-Temperature Alkaline
Ammonia Electrolysis Using a Gross Margin Model</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Haowei Long (12257304)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Chun Yat Sit (20738532)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Jitendra K. Gupta (20494658)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Michael A. Reynolds (2968887)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Yoon Jun Son (4591408)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kun Zhang (108291)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Andrew A. Gewirth (1272132)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Paul J. A. Kenis (8130771)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Molecular Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>working charge ratio</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>membrane electrode assembly</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>findings offer guidance</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>easier liquefaction compared</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>capital recovery factor</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>applied cell potential</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>although thermal cracking</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>practical performance window</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>performance data validated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ammonia transportation cost</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ammonia electrolysis provides</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>alkaline ammonia electrolysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>consumer price index</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sensitivity analysis shows</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>promising hydrogen carrier</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>maximizing economic returns</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>based ammonia electrolysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ammonia utilization efficiency</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>typical market prices</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>future system design</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>high hydrogen density</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>performance goals</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ammonia crossover</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reactant prices</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>faradaic efficiency</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>electricity price</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>economic analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>different market</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>current density</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>based framework</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>extracting hydrogen</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>economic assumptions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>analysis confirms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>temperature alternative</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>system profitability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>specific conditions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>remaining concerns</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>plant costs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>operational conditions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>modular use</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>maintenance costs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>main method</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gross margin</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>greatest impact</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>fully understood</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>fixed operating</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>faces challenges</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>evaluate profitability</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Ammonia has become a promising hydrogen carrier because
of its
high hydrogen density, established infrastructure, and easier liquefaction
compared with hydrogen. Although thermal cracking is currently the
main method for extracting hydrogen from ammonia, it is energy intensive
and not ideal for decentralized or modular use. Ammonia electrolysis
provides a low-temperature alternative but faces challenges that have
not yet been fully understood. In this study, we perform a techno-economic
analysis of alkaline ammonia electrolysis in membrane electrode assembly
(MEA) cells with performance data validated through experiments and
strategies involving dynamic operation. The analysis incorporates
key techno-economic assumptions, including the capital recovery factor,
consumer price index, Faradaic efficiency, ammonia utilization efficiency,
ammonia transportation cost, balance-of-plant costs, and fixed operating
and maintenance costs. A gross margin-based framework is employed
to evaluate profitability under different market and operational conditions,
including current density threshold and applied cell potential. The
system can achieve positive gross margins in certain applications
at the typical market prices. Sensitivity analysis shows that product
and reactant prices, followed by applied cell potential and electricity
price, have the greatest impact on the system profitability. Operational
analysis also reveals a trade-off between the current density and
working charge ratio that defines a practical performance window for
maximizing economic returns. While this analysis confirms the feasibility
of MEA-based ammonia electrolysis under specific conditions, additional
research is necessary to address the remaining concerns about durability,
ammonia crossover, and catalyst poisoning. The findings offer guidance
for the future system design and performance goals.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Journal contribution</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c04268.s001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Techno-Economic_Analysis_of_Low-Temperature_Alkaline_Ammonia_Electrolysis_Using_a_Gross_Margin_Model/34037495</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
