2026-10-13T18:51:03Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/34036771 2026-09-30T20:01:40Z category_7 category_8 category_12 category_21 category_61 category_64 category_106 category_122 category_132 portal_5 item_type_3 month_year_09_2026

<p>Sample quotations per category and theme.</p> Mariëlle L. de Goede (18318301) Paul A. Boelen (7421981) Brett T. Litz (11958745) F. Jackie June ter Heide (13028523) Medicine Microbiology Cell Biology Biotechnology Developmental Biology Cancer Science Policy Mental Health Infectious Diseases point scale ). generated insightful content completed questionnaires assessing general inductive approach found preliminary evidence interview transcripts revealed helped veterans share support descriptive assessment diagnostic clinical interview mapping moral injury potentially valuable treatment several interview questions driven approach centered assessment clinical interview moral injury treatment planning planning treatment clinical utility xlink "> veteran populations qualitative analysis planning tool pencil approaches military veterans military version informed process groups agreed fostering trust complements paper case conceptualization assess exposure analyzed using &# 8217 <div> <p>Objective</p><p>There is currently no clinical interview to assess exposure to potentially morally injurious experiences (PMIEs) and moral injury, the potential clinical outcome associated with PMIEs. To enable a person-centered assessment of PMIEs and moral injury in military veterans, we developed a structured, non-diagnostic clinical interview to support descriptive assessment, case conceptualization, and treatment planning, and conducted an initial evaluation of its feasibility, acceptability, and clinical utility.</p> <p>Method</p><p>The Clinical Interview for Moral Injury—Military Version (CIMI-M) was developed through an iterative, stakeholder-informed process. Questions from existing moral injury instruments were selected, adapted and supplemented to create an interview with a descriptive, theory-driven approach. Clinicians (N = 7) and military veterans (N = 8) at two Dutch trauma centers who conducted the CIMI-M were interviewed and completed questionnaires assessing the CIMI-M’s feasibility, acceptability, and clinical utility. Interviews were analyzed using the General Inductive Approach for qualitative evaluation data.</p> <p>Results</p><p>Mean evaluation scores were 7.63 for veterans and 8.41 for clinicians (10-point scale). Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts revealed that the CIMI-M helped veterans share their experiences, while clinicians found it valuable for fostering trust and planning treatment. Both groups agreed that the CIMI-M generated insightful content about PMIEs and moral injury. Based on feedback, several interview questions were revised or added.</p> <p>Conclusions</p><p>We found preliminary evidence that the CIMI-M is a feasible, acceptable, and clinically useful descriptive interview. It offers a potentially valuable treatment-planning tool that complements paper-and-pencil approaches that assess PMIEs and moral injury. Further evaluation, including in non-veteran populations, is needed.</p></div> 2026-09-30T20:01:36Z Dataset Dataset 10.1371/journal.pone.0359553.t001 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Sample_quotations_per_category_and_theme_p_/34036771 CC BY 4.0