<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T20:21:13Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34035879" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34035879</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-30T17:42:08Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_272</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_39</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_811</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Average posterior model probability (PMP) and percentage of times the PMP was larger than 0.75 of the snapshot hybrid method. The results are shown for the effect size of the snapshot that is equal to the true effect size in the numerical study.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Robbie C. M. van Aert (25145382)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Marcel A.L.M. van Assen (24951081)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rubén López-Nicolás (25145385)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Ecology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt; replications</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>typical sample sizes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>replicated 274 effects</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>often insufficient information</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>drawing definite conclusions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>open question remains</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>numerical study tailored</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>numerical study show</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multiple research fields</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>favorable statistical properties</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>assessing replication success</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>score data revealed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scale replication project</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>one original study</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>replication success methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>statistical properties</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>replication success</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>open research</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>one replication</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>original study</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>statistical perspective</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>thirteen methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>analysis methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>systematizing confidence</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>substantially closer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>second goal</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>score project</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>score data</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>replication compared</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reliably draw</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>recommend researchers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>recent large</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>potential bias</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>political science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>null hypothesis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>novel perspective</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>make sure</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>first goal</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>extended analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>estimators based</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Average posterior model probability (PMP) and percentage of times the PMP was larger than 0.75 of the snapshot hybrid method. The results are shown for the effect size of the snapshot that is equal to the true effect size in the numerical study.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-30T17:41:57Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0358126.t005</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Average_posterior_model_probability_PMP_and_percentage_of_times_the_PMP_was_larger_than_0_75_of_the_snapshot_hybrid_method_The_results_are_shown_for_the_effect_size_of_the_snapshot_that_is_equal_to_the_true_effect_size_in_the_numerical_s/34035879</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
