<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-11T21:44:35Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34035855" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34035855</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-30T17:41:58Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_272</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_39</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_811</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_1</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Probability of replication success if the true effect sizes of the original study and replication are different.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Robbie C. M. van Aert (25145382)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Marcel A.L.M. van Assen (24951081)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rubén López-Nicolás (25145385)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Ecology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt; replications</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>typical sample sizes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>replicated 274 effects</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>often insufficient information</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>drawing definite conclusions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>open question remains</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>numerical study tailored</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>numerical study show</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multiple research fields</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>favorable statistical properties</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>assessing replication success</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>score data revealed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scale replication project</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>one original study</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>replication success methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>statistical properties</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>replication success</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>open research</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>one replication</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>original study</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>statistical perspective</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>thirteen methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>analysis methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>systematizing confidence</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>substantially closer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>second goal</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>score project</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>score data</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>replication compared</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reliably draw</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>recommend researchers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>recent large</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>potential bias</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>political science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>null hypothesis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>novel perspective</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>make sure</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>first goal</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>extended analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>estimators based</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;The included methods are whether the original study’s effect size is in the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the replication, equivalence test, Sceptical &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;-value, Hedges’ &lt;i&gt;Q&lt;/i&gt;/95% prediction interval (PI), agreement in sign and statistical significance, and replication Bayes factor. The numbers on the right-hand side and on the top of the figure refer to the sample sizes of the original study and replication, respectively. The &lt;i&gt;x&lt;/i&gt;-axis refers to the true Pearson correlation of the original study () and replication ().&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-30T17:41:57Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Image</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Figure</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0358126.g001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/figure/_p_Probability_of_replication_success_if_the_true_effect_sizes_of_the_original_study_and_replication_are_different_p_/34035855</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
