2026-10-06T05:08:50Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/34030848 2026-09-30T14:01:05Z category_29284 category_29317 category_25663 category_29263 category_29260 item_type_11 month_year_09_2026

Celebrity “Real Vampire” as Class Relation: Structural Extraction through Labor, Publicity, Audiences and Platform Capitalism (Subject-Specific Annotated Bibliography for Eric Bogosian Is a Real Vampire And So Can You: A 1990s-Style Unauthorized Biography) A. Ghost Writer (25113858) Cultural and creative industries Cultural studies not elsewhere classified Drama, theatre and performance studies Media studies Media industry studies Vampires Eric Bogosian Biography Star Studies Celebrity Studies Algorithmic Governance Fandom Studies Reception Studies Platform Capitalism Karl Marx Marxism, Base, Superstructure, Ideology, Class Struggle Karl Marx famously describes capital as “dead labour which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labour.” The vampire in this conception is not principally a metaphysics or ethic. It names a relation of exchange. When applied to the “star image,” this relation is structurally extractive in the sense of celebrity as accumulated value (i.e. a profit-generating brand) animated through the labor of living subjects with less relative power (e.g. audiences, publicity workers, journalists).This bibliography on celebrity takes class relation as one point of departure for theorizing what “real vampire” might mean within star studies. While extraction (even what could be considered parasitism) is a recurring component of the vampire in the cultural imaginary, its full scope is more heterogeneous. The vampire is more comprehensively approached as a problem of exchange. Who gives what to whom and under what conditions? Whether exchange is reciprocal or asymmetric. How value changes its basis as it circulates. Whose labor becomes in/visible, who captures the resulting value and what institutional power determines the terms of participation?Celebrity is particularly productive for this inquiry because the apparently singular celebrity is necessarily socially produced. A star image accumulates through performances but also through the paid and unpaid labor, whether as a wage relation or uncompensated reception. As wage labor this can include agents, managers, publicists, journalists, marketers, lawyers, corporate communications departments and platform workers. Unpaid labor includes audiences who contribute through attention, affect, discussion, circulation, interpretation, defense, criticism and fan production.Though reception studies centers audiences as interpretive agents, celebrity as class relation requires analysis of audiences as objects. With Artificial Intelligence (AI) augmenting existing data harvesting infrastructure, audiences also contribute non-consensually to machine-readable (and monetizable) behavioral data. Contemporary publicity systems aggregate data of audience activities through social listening, sentiment analysis, reputation monitoring and other modes of computational market intelligence, returning reception to the production process as actionable information.Viewing the celebrity vampire through the lens of exchange reveals commodification of both star and audience, with profit siphoned upward towards media corporations and increasingly private equity. An audience member may voluntarily produce art as a gift to other audience members while that activity simultaneously increases the commercial value of an intellectual property. An audience member may also express genuine affection for a celebrity while that attachment becomes measurable engagement, market intelligence and advertising inventory. But this is not limited to audiences. A celebrity may perform relational labor for an audience while employees and contractors perform additional labor maintaining the celebrity as a branded cultural object. And a platform may facilitate community while extracting data from the relationships it makes possible. Exploitation therefore does not require that pleasure, or even agency, be fictitious. The critical question is how different types of value are produced and distributed across unequal relations, who controls the terms of exchange and when affect is converted to capital, to put it bluntly, where does the money go?Information governance designates one especially important dimension of these class relations in the construction and maintenance of a star. Wealthy cultural actors and corporate institutions possess unequal access to systems for generating preferred narratives while simultaneously invisibilizing counter-narratives through structures of “reputation management,” including publicity, journalist access, crisis communication and legal teams. At the same time, the platforms through which audiences encounter celebrities govern visibility of information and, with AI search surfaces, the narrative of what is considered true.Read through the larger project’s vampire framework, the celebrity is therefore neither simply extractive nor simply extracted. The star can simultaneously be a worker, asset, generator of audience affect and beneficiary of labor performed by others. “Real vampire” in terms of celebrity class relations asks: what kinds of exchange animate a celebrity body marketed as singular?<h3 dir="ltr">I. Capital and Celebrity as Extractive Relation</h3>Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1, translated by Ben Fowkes, Penguin, 1976.Karl Marx supplies this section’s foundational vampire metaphor, where accumulated capital remains productive by incorporating living labor. It provides a conceptual framework for analyzing how apparently autonomous cultural assets (i.e. celebrities) remain dependent upon recurrent transfers of labor and value.Smythe, Dallas W. “Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism.” Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, vol. 1, no. 3, 1977, pp. 1–27.A theory of audience as commodity which shifts political-economic analysis from media content toward the labor performed by audiences whose attention is sold to advertisers.Terranova, Tiziana. “Fr** Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy.” Social Text, vol. 18, no. 2, 2000, pp. 33–58. Terranova theorizes the voluntary and affective activity of networked users as “fr** labor”, activity that may be meaningful to participants while simultaneously creating economic value without a conventional wage relation.Fuchs, Christian. Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge, 2014.Develops a systematic Marxian analysis of digital labor across the global information economy, extending audience-labor theory to social-media users alongside employed workers. Places apparently immaterial activities such as digital interactions and data generation within broader capitalist production.Jarrett, Kylie. Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. Routledge, 2016.Marxist feminist theories of feminized labor are brought into digital-media analysis. Her “digital housewife” framework theorizes digital community-making as activities that remain irreducible to commodities while nevertheless being incorporated into commercial accumulation.Arvidsson, Adam, and Tiziano Bonini. “Valuing Audience Passions: From Smythe to Tarde.” European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 2015, pp. 158–173. Revisits the audience as a commodity in social media relations, where commercial analytics increasingly attempt to measure influence. The article theorizes audience affect itself as an object of valuation and measurement.<h3 dir="ltr">II. Celebrity as Industry and Commodity</h3>Turner, Graeme. Understanding Celebrity. 2nd ed., SAGE, 2014.Turner’s account of “celebrity industries” treats celebrity simultaneously as cultural representation, commodity and industry. Provides a conceptual bridge between textual analysis of the star image and analysis of the professional workers and institutions responsible for producing and maintaining it.Marshall, P. David. Celebrity and Power: F**e in Contemporary Culture. 2nd ed., University of Minnesota Press, 2014.Celebrity as a form of cultural power organized around the circulation of public personality. Digital “public intimacy” is useful for understanding how celebrity value increasingly depends upon continuous connection between public figures and audiences.Hearn, Alison. “‘Meat, Mask, Burden’: Probing the Contours of the Branded ‘Self.’” Journal of Consumer Culture, vol. 8, no. 2, 2008, pp. 197–217. Theorizes self-branding as a type of labor where the individual produces a circulating public persona positioned as a site for value extraction.Taylor, Anthea. “‘Is This All We Want from a Field Called Celebrity Studies?’: On the Enduring Leg**y of Graeme Turner’s Approach to F**e.” Media International Australia, vol. 200, no. 1, 2026, pp. 21–32. Argues for the field of celebrity studies to prioritize focus on contemporary publicity infrastructure and the labor of maintaining visibility.<h3 dir="ltr">III. Audiences, Uncompensated Affective Labor and Data Work</h3>Andrejevic, Mark. “Watching Television Without Pity: The Productivity of Online Fans.” Television & New Media, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008, pp. 24–46. How digital audience activities can simultaneously produce community and provide producers with uncompensated market research.Zwick, Detlev, Samuel K. Bonsu, and Aron Darmody. “Putting Consumers to Work: ‘Co-Creation’ and New Marketing Govern-mentality.” Journal of Consumer Culture, vol. 8, no. 2, 2008, pp. 163–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540508090089.Zwick, Bonsu and Darmody analyze corporate “co-creation” as a mode of governance in which consumers are encouraged to exercise creativity and autonomy in ways that simultaneously generate commercially appropriable value.Stanfill, Mel. Exploiting Fandom: How the Media Industry Seeks to Manipulate Fans. University of Iowa Press, 2019.Analyzes the entertainment industry’s attempts to cultivate forms of audience engagement that are manageable and commercially productive.Abidin, Crystal. “Visibility Labour: Engaging with Influencers’ Fashion Brands and #OOTD Advertorial Campaigns on Instagram.” Media International Australia, vol. 161, no. 1, 2016, pp. 86–100. Develops the concept of “visibility labour” to describe the work audiences perform in sustaining visibility within social media economies.Baym, Nancy K. “Connect with Your Audience! The Relational Labor of Connection.” The Communication Review, vol. 18, no. 1, 2015, pp. 14–22. Theorizes sustained artist-audience connection as relational labor and how ongoing communicative work is required to create and maintain relationships with audiences, complicating a one-directional extraction model by showing that celebrities are cultural workers who perform labor in maintaining the affective relationship from which value emerges.Brown, Natalie A., and Andrew C. Billings. “Sports Fans as Crisis Communicators on Social Media Websites.” Public Relations Review, vol. 39, no. 1, 2013, pp. 74–81. An analysis of how strongly identified audience members spontaneously reproduce recognizable organizational reputation maintenance and repair strategies for celebrities. These include including ingratiation, reminders of positive history, attacks on accusers and diversion of attention.He, Qijun, and Yungeng Li. “Civic Engagement Intention and the Data-Driven Fan Community: Investigating the Motivation Behind Chinese Fans’ O****e Data-Making Behavior From a Collective Action Perspective.” Social Media + Society, vol. 9, no. 1, 2023. He and Li study organized audience “data-making”, time- and money-intensive activity performed to manipulate visibility metrics and improve a celebrity’s platform standing.<h3 dir="ltr">IV. Publicity and Industrial Audience Surveillance</h3>Buzoianu, Corina, and Monica Bîră. “Using Social Media Listening in Crisis Communication and Management: New Methods and Practices for Looking into Crises.” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 23, 2021, article 13015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313015.Buzoianu and Bîră describe the audience monitoring apparatus of social media listening (or “social istening”) as an operational component of crisis communications and management. The article establishes the practical incorporation of audience discourse into organizational crisis-management workflows.Westermann, Arne, and Jörg Forthmann. “Social Listening: A Potential Game Changer in Reputation Management—How Big Data Analysis Can Contribute to Understanding Stakeholders’ Views on Organisations.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, 2021, pp. 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2020-0028.Examines algorithmic reputation analysis across approximately 350 million digital sources. The study demonstrates the industrial scale at which public discourse can be captured and converted into reputation-management knowledge.Hayes, Jameson L., et al. “Can Social Media Listening Platforms’ Artificial Intelligence Be Trusted? Examining the Accuracy of Crimson Hexagon’s (Now Brandwatch Consumer Research’s) AI-Driven Analyses.” Journal of Advertising, vol. 50, no. 1, 2021, pp. 81–91. Hayes and colleagues test the automated classifications produced by a commercial social-listening system and find significant reliability problems in sentiment and brand-outcome classification.Maligenova, Alima, and Admilson Veloso da Silva. “Crisis Communication on Instagram: Celebrity Apologies and the Role of Image Repair Strategies in Shaping Public Perception.” Social Semiotics, vol. 36, no. 2, 2026, pp. 249–267. A study of celebrity crisis statements and audience reactions on Instagram. Their model treats celebrity crisis communication as a feedback system in which public figures intervene in reputation while simultaneously receiving immediate information about audience response.Rynarzewska, Ania Izabela, et al. “The Role of Social Media Content Creators in Reputation Repair: A Netnographic Study of Depp v. Heard.” Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 35, no. 3, 2026, pp. 429–447. Rynarzewska and colleagues examine social media content creators as strategic intermediaries in celebrity reputation repair. Their case study concludes that creators engaged by a celebrity’s team influenced digital communities and helped reshape the celebrity brand.<h3 dir="ltr">V. Algorithmic Governance as Labor Relation</h3>Duffy, Brooke Erin, and Colten Meisner. “Platform Governance at the Margins: Social Media Creators’ Experiences with Algorithmic (In)visibility.” Media, Culture & Society, vol. 45, no. 2, 2023, pp. 285–304. Drawing on interviews with marginalized and stigmatized creators, the article examines shadowbanning and attempts to adapt to opaque recommendation systems. Algorithmic visibility is theorized as a classed governance problem because creators are structurally dependent on platforms whose decisions they have little meaningful power to contest.Roberts, Sarah T. Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media. Yale University Press, 2019.An ethnography revealing the human labor hidden behind apparently automated platform governance. The book examines how informational visibility itself depends upon an often precarious, globally distributed workforce.De Gregorio, Giovanni, and Roxana Radu. “Digital Constitutionalism in the New Era of Internet Governance.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, 2022, pp. 68–87. Examines the emergence of private digital powers performing governance functions conventionally associated with public authority.<h3 dir="ltr">VI. Astroturfing, Bots and Manufactured Consensus (and Division)</h3>Ferrara, Emilio, et al. “The Rise of Social Bots.” Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 7, 2016, pp. 96–104. Ferrara and colleagues survey automated accounts capable of participating in social networks and amplifying preferred content.Chan, Jovy. “Online Astroturfing: A Problem beyond Disinformation.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 50, no. 3, 2024, pp. 507–528. Argues that astroturfing is harmful because manufactured social signals alter what observers believe other audience members believe. Theorizes manipulation through the falsification of the social environment itself. 2026-09-30T14:01:05Z Text Online resource 10.6084/m9.figshare.34030848.v5 https://figshare.com/articles/online_resource/Celebrity_Real_Vampire_as_Class_Relation_Structural_Extraction_through_Labor_Publicity_Audiences_and_Platform_Capitalism_i_A_Subject-Specific_Annotated_Bibliography_for_Eric_Bogosian_Is_a_Real_Vampire_and_So_Can_You_A_1990s-Style_Unauthoriz/34030848 CC BY 4.0