<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T17:15:05Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34027267" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34027267</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-29T18:18:10Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_1</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_7</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_15</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_873</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_931</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_811</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_64</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_63</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Benchmarking Experiments
with External Data, Domain-Specific
Features, and Learning Strategies for Modeling ADME and Potency of
Coronavirus Main Protease Inhibitors</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Ida Titus (22182380)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ashok Palaniappan (3165975)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biophysics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Medicine</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Neuroscience</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Information Systems not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cancer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>withstand close inspection</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>strongest significant generalization</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reproducible computational foundation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>openadmet consortium hosted</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>graph neural network</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>evaluating critical assumptions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>challenge test set</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>aware attentivefp graph</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>antiviral drug candidates</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>antiviral compounds could</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>transformer model yielded</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>consistently optimal model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ensemble integration approaches</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ensemble fusion strategies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>distinctive chemical properties</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>classical machine learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>&gt;&lt; sup &gt;&lt;</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>optimal xgboost model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>aware modeling strategy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>curated public data</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gnn variants across</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>learning strategies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>model selection</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>pharmacokinetic properties</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>enhanced xgboost</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>based approaches</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>&gt;&lt;/ sup</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>work provides</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>statistical benchmarking</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>splitting protocols</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>specific features</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>rigorous setting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>requiring prediction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multitarget settings</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>molecular design</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>mdckii ).</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>identifying antivirals</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>feature space</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>factorial design</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>external data</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>explicitly engineered</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>end point</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>dramatically accelerate</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>clinical evaluation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>broader tree</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>blind evaluation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>beyond benchmarking</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>analysis revealed</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Predictive computational models of potency and pharmacokinetic
properties of antiviral drug candidates can dramatically accelerate
the path from molecular design to clinical evaluation. The ASAP-Polaris-OpenADMET
consortium hosted the open-science Antiviral Drug Discovery Challenge
2025, providing a rigorous setting for this problem and requiring
prediction of potency against the SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;i&gt;pro&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; alongside five ADME end
points (LogD, KSOL, HLM, MLM, and MDR1-MDCKII). In response, we pursued
a domain-aware modeling strategy, reasoning that the distinctive chemical
properties of antiviral compounds could be explicitly engineered in
the feature space. We tested this premise by isolating the key molecular
descriptors capable of identifying antivirals, augmenting challenge
data sets with curated public data, and building both classical machine
learning and graph neural network (GNN) variants. For ADME modeling,
ensemble gradient boosting models trained on our bespoke feature space
consistently outperformed both broader tree-based approaches and GNN
variants across the five ADME end points in blind evaluation. By a
factorial design of experiments and statistical benchmarking, we evaluated
the performance of the optimal XGBoost model for each end point. For
modeling potency, we explored varied pretraining paradigms and ensemble
fusion strategies, and found that a stacking ensemble combining docking-enhanced
XGBoost with a stereochemistry-aware AttentiveFP Graph-Transformer
model yielded the strongest significant generalization on the Challenge
test set, suggesting that orthogonal model families reduced epistemic
uncertainty attributable to model selection in data-limited, multitarget
settings. Beyond benchmarking, our experiments provided a testbed
for evaluating critical assumptions in the field, encompassing data
augmentation strategies, splitting protocols, and ensemble integration
approaches. Our analysis revealed that a consistently optimal model
is elusive, and that several standard industry practices fail to withstand
close inspection. Overall, our work provides both practical benchmarked
modeling strategies for ADME and potency prediction and a reproducible
computational foundation for AI-driven antiviral drug discovery efforts.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1021/acs.jcim.6c00304.s002</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Benchmarking_Experiments_with_External_Data_Domain-Specific_Features_and_Learning_Strategies_for_Modeling_ADME_and_Potency_of_Coronavirus_Main_Protease_Inhibitors/34027267</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
