<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-12T00:03:04Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34026366" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34026366</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-29T17:30:10Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_64</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_132</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_6</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Comparing stakeholder perspectives across acceptability framework domains.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Herni Susanti (7356302)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Novitri Nurimani Asha (25138329)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Penny Bee (456567)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Heni Dwi Windarwati (17127892)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Budi Anna Keliat (20867123)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Atik Puji Rahayu (16449555)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Amy Blakemore (3570152)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Afni Handayani (25138332)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Mochamad Ali Sodikin (25138335)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Helen Brooks (397642)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cancer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Infectious Diseases</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt; using</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>resourced health system</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reflecting limited understanding</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>people experiencing anxiety</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>mental health problems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>many conflating lipis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>lay health workers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>largely unaddressed drivers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>distress became severe</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>anxiety remain major</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>alongside undercertainty regarding</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>across 12 sites</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>21 focus groups</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>study offers one</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>strong perceived need</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>promising subsequent uptake</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>positive affective attitudes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>intensity psychological interventions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt; depression</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cultural alignment suggest</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>study examines</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>strong perceptions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>promising pathway</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>affective attitude</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>workload demands</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>urgently needed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>treatment gap</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>trained non</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>traditional healers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>theoretical framework</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>tfa ),</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>tailored adaptations</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>structured interviews</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>stakeholder workshops</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>stakeholder perspectives</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>specialists offer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>southeast asia</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>social judgment</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scarce resources</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scalable solutions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>rural areas</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>religious leaders</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>particularlyprivacy risks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>often delayed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>logistical burden</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>local languages</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>lmics ),</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>independently back</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>income countries</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Comparing stakeholder perspectives across acceptability framework domains.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-29T17:30:08Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Journal contribution</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0358869.s001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/_p_Comparing_stakeholder_perspectives_across_acceptability_framework_domains_p_/34026366</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
