<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T11:38:29Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34021140" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34021140</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-29T04:28:06Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_31208</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_31625</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_33896</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_33911</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_33752</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_1005</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_6</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Implementation of a multi-component strategy to optimise the timing and use of induction of labour: a multiple-methods evaluation</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Susan Perlen (15995354)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rachael CUSWORTH (25135119)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Alemayehu Mekonnen (13058082)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Vanessa Watkins (13099554)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Vidanka Vasilevski (13098825)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Linda Sweet (13082235)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Alison Hutchinson (13057050)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biomedical and clinical sciences</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Reproductive medicine</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Midwifery</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Nursing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Health sciences</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Dissemination and Implementation Research</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>7.3 Management and decision making</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>8.1 Organisation and delivery of services</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Reproductive health and childbirth</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Guideline</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Health services</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Implementation science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Induction of labour</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Midwifery</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Perinatal care</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Background Induction of labour rates are rising worldwide and, in certain contexts, are associated with poorer outcomes for some women and babies. In Australia, the induction rate has increased by 8% to 33% since 2010. At a large regional health service in Victoria, Australia, maternity staff developed a toolkit (guidance document and forms) to improve induction of labour decision-making and processes. Aims To evaluate the impact of implementing the induction of labour toolkit to reduce variation in practice and support IOL decision making processes in a single site, regional health service. Methods Multiple-method, descriptive study design. Phase 1 - audit of routinely collected perinatal data, 11 months pre- and 11 months post-toolkit implementation; Phase 2 - focus group interview with clinicians. Findings 1,849 women (970 pre-implementation and 879 post-implementation) underwent induction of labour, with no statistically significant difference between groups (970/2571 versus 879/2440, p=0.212). Toolkit implementation was not associated with significant differences in labour, birth, or neonatal outcomes between groups. Four themes were identified through thematic analysis of the interview data: three related to improved induction of labour practice: 1) consistent information sharing with women and families, 2) embedding best practice, and 3) improved interprofessional collaboration. The final theme reflected the barriers to toolkit adherence: 4) challenges operationalising the process. Conclusions Qualitative findings suggest that implementing an induction of labour toolkit that includes evidence-based guidance can support clinicians’ practice. Health services need to integrate strategies to support effective implementation of processes and practices, with further evaluation of the implementation and sustainability.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Journal contribution</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.26187/deakin.34021140</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Implementation_of_a_multi-component_strategy_to_optimise_the_timing_and_use_of_induction_of_labour_a_multiple-methods_evaluation/34021140</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
