<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-13T18:17:36Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34015221" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34015221</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-29T15:29:00Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_28864</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_543</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_8</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Advancing a Comprehensive Understanding of AI-Related Risk: From Individual Studies to Collective Insights</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Shasha Yu (12883613)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Artificial intelligence not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Artificial Intelligence</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>AI Risk</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>AI Safety</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Responsible AI</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Artificial intelligence introduces complex and multifaceted risks that are often examined within particular technical, institutional, governance, or human contexts. This fragmentation creates challenges for understanding how different forms of AI-related risk are represented across contexts and analytical levels. This thesis addresses this problem through a programme of seven published studies and a retrospective cross-portfolio synthesis of their findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;The studies examine AI-related risk across national security, policing, AI privacy-protection research, human–AI trust, smart home environments, the operational behaviour of LLM-based agents, and AI risk understanding and judgement among university students. Three overarching research questions examine how AI-related risks manifest across institutional and social contexts; structural characteristics and gaps in AI privacy-protection research; and patterns across the portfolio and the further insights they provide into AI-related risk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;The portfolio provides different forms of evidence across these questions. Papers 1, 2, 4 and 5 provide institutional, conceptual and framework-based perspectives on AI-related risk. Paper 3 identifies substantial growth in AI privacy-protection research alongside geographical concentration, technically dominant research trajectories, and comparatively underdeveloped human-centred, ethical and legal dimensions. Paper 6 identifies divergence between policy-aligned language and executed action in LLM-based agents, while Paper 7 identifies a gap between stated risk awareness and applied risk judgement. Comparison across the portfolio further identifies recurring patterns concerning surface indicators, blind spots in risk assessment, the multidimensional character of AI-related risk, and the different analytical levels represented across the studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;The cross-portfolio synthesis organises these findings through two complementary perspectives: a Meta–Macro–Meso–Micro analytical structure and a comprehensive conceptualisation comprising five interconnected risk domains. These perspectives are organisational and descriptive syntheses grounded in the domains examined in the portfolio. They provide an analytical reference for considering AI-related risk across different levels, contexts, and dimensions, while their applicability to additional domains requires further validation and may require extension or revision. Together, the portfolio provides a comprehensive but bounded synthesis of AI-related risk across the domains examined. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-29T15:29:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.25401/cardiffmet.34015221.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Advancing_a_Comprehensive_Understanding_of_AI-Related_Risk_From_Individual_Studies_to_Collective_Insights/34015221</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
