<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-12T19:29:44Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34013746" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34013746</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-28T12:34:45Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_4</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_13</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_14</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_15</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_19</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_873</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_931</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_64</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_63</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>T‑ANALYZE
as a Workflow for Matched Molecule
Pair Analysis on Peptides</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Robert P. Sheridan (1271010)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biochemistry</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Genetics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Molecular Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Neuroscience</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Pharmacology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Information Systems not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cancer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>“ transformation ”,</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>closely related drug</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>180 – 192</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>handle individual molecules</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>finding local changes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>e ., adding</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>predicting activity cliffs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>e .,</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>assuming molecules</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>typical machine</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>training set</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>small set</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>small enough</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sized compounds</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>similar compounds</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>monomer names</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>matched pair</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>learning algorithms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>give rise</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>easily seen</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>displays sets</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>dimensional list</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>data set</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cycpeptmpdb dataset</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>consistent changes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>connection tables</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>candidate drugs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>absolute value</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Matched
molecular pairs (MMP) is an approach to finding local changes
in structure that give rise to consistent changes in activity. Assuming
molecules A and B are in a matched pair, one can imagine a “transformation”,
i.e., adding, removing, or exchanging a small set of atoms that changes
A to B. Typical machine-learning algorithms are meant to handle individual
molecules A, and model the activity difference between A and the average
activity, and are agnostic to the presence of similar compounds in
the training set. In contrast, MMP looks for differences between similar
compounds A and B and is agnostic to the absolute value of the activities
of A and B. Machine learning models tend to be poor at predicting
activity cliffs, while MMP is designed to identify them. Previously,
we (Sheridan et al., &lt;i&gt;J. Chem. Inf. Model.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;2006&lt;/b&gt;, 46, 180–192) suggested a workflow T-ANALYZE that organizes
and displays sets of closely related drug-sized compounds such that
any consistent MMP-based structure-activity in a data set can be easily
seen. Nowadays, peptides are under consideration as candidate drugs
and the MMP approach should be extended to them. Peptides are small
enough that they can be treated as connection tables, i.e., atoms
connected with bonds. Alternatively, they can be written as sequences,
i.e., a one-dimensional list of monomer names. In this paper, we adapt
the T-ANALYZE workflow to peptides represented both as connection
tables and as sequences. We demonstrate this on the PAMPA activity
of the CycPeptMPDB dataset.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01414.s003</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/T_ANALYZE_as_a_Workflow_for_Matched_Molecule_Pair_Analysis_on_Peptides/34013746</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
