<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-10T19:57:50Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34008888" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34008888</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-28T05:01:17Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_19</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_316</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Table 4_Carbapenem-based versus non-carbapenem therapy for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia in a resource-limited setting: a retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes.docx</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Uroosa Kanwal (25119567)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Iyad Naeem Muhammad (12846660)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ale Zehra (5830559)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Syed Shaukat Ali Muttaqi Shah (23246078)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Falak Abro (16819266)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Tehreem Ansari (23246075)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Najia Rahim (13775219)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rabya Munawar (25119570)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Mujahid Hussain (13410947)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Pharmacology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>antimicrobial stewardship</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>carbapenem combination therapy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>carbapenem monotherapy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>pathogen-specific mortality</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP)</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>carbapenem-based therapy</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Background&lt;p&gt;Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are major causes of in-hospital mortality and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Carbapenems are commonly used due to their broad-spectrum activity; however, their efficacy in real-world clinical practices comparing carbapenem with non-carbapenem regimens in these settings is limited.&lt;/p&gt;Objectives&lt;p&gt;To compare clinical outcomes between patients receiving carbapenem-based and non-carbapenem therapy for HAP and VAP at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.&lt;/p&gt;Methods&lt;p&gt;This retrospective cohort study included 93 adult patients (HAP: n = 62, VAP: n = 31) over the period of 1 year. Demographics, comorbidities, microbial isolates, treatment regimen, and clinical outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and risk ratio calculations with 95% confidence interval. Multivariable logistic regression was planned to adjust for confounders but was not feasible due to missing severity score and biomarker data.&lt;/p&gt;Results&lt;p&gt;HAP was more common in females (63%), while VAP showed a male predominance (52%). The most common pathogens were Acinetobacter spp. (HAP: 11.3%; VAP: 19.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (HAP: 11.3%; VAP: 16.1%). The most prevalent comorbidity in HAP was diabetes mellitus (38.7%). Carbapenem-based therapy (meropenem) was used in 65.6% of cases and the most frequently prescribed non-carbapenem agents were piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, and colistin. No significant difference in mortality was observed between carbapenem and non-carbapenem therapy in HAP (31.6% vs. 29.2%; RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.50–2.36, p = 0.840) or VAP (65.2% vs. 50.0%; RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.61–2.77, p = 0.440). VAP was associated with significantly higher crude mortality than HAP (61.3% vs. 30.6%; p = 0.005). Crude mortality rates appeared highest among patients in the Acinetobacter baumannii group (70.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa group (31.3%), though treatment group difference were not statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt;Conclusion&lt;p&gt;In this single-center retrospective cohort, no statistically significant association between carbapenem-based therapy and all-cause in-hospital mortality was detected in HAP or VAP. Crude mortality appeared highest among patients with Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas isolates. However, wide confidence intervals, treatment-selection bias, and unadjusted analyses preclude definitive conclusions. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating, requiring confirmation in adequately powered, larger prospective studies.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-28T05:01:17Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.3389/jpps.2026.17336.s006</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_4_Carbapenem-based_versus_non-carbapenem_therapy_for_hospital-acquired_and_ventilator-associated_pneumonia_in_a_resource-limited_setting_a_retrospective_cohort_study_of_clinical_outcomes_docx/34008888</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
