<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-12T19:58:17Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34008294" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34008294</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-28T04:30:04Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_62</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_316</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Data Sheet 1_Estimating surface pCO2 and its long-term variability in the East China Sea using machine learning with satellite data.pdf</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Do-Hyeon Kwon (25119393)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Young-Heon Jo (518000)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>JeongHee Shim (11550673)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>HuiTae Joo (12900665)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Marine Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>air-sea CO2 flux</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>East China Sea</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>machine learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ocean colour</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sea surface pCO2</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Accurate estimation of sea surface partial pressure of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; (pCO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) in optically complex coastal waters remains challenging due to significant biogeochemical heterogeneity. This study develops a machine learning approach to reconstruct pCO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; in the East China Sea (ECS) from 2003 to 2023, utilizing MODIS-derived optical classification. Using normalized water-leaving radiance at 555 nm (nL&lt;sub&gt;w&lt;/sub&gt;555) as a threshold (1.5 mW cm&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt;µm&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; sr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;), the ECS was classified into two distinct regimes: Clear Water (CW) and Turbid Water (TW). Then, the pCO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; was reconstructed using a Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) model that integrates multi-spectral satellite variables as numerical predictors with an optically-derived Water Case as a categorical input feature to account for heterogeneity. Evaluated on the test dataset, this approach achieved high overall accuracy (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.86, RMSE = 16.55 µatm), notably reducing prediction errors (RMSE) in TW by up to ~81% compared to conventional models. The model maintained robust regime-level generalization (CW: R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.82, RMSE = 15.64 µatm; TW: R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.82, RMSE = 22.01 µatm). The 21-year climatology reveals distinct mean pCO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; levels for CW (361.2 µatm) and TW (415.1 µatm). While CW exhibits strong summer biological drawdown, TW functions as a highly variable net CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; source driven by positive non-thermal anomalies (+28.09 µatm). Over the 21-year period, the atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; growth rate (+2.41 µatm yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) significantly outpaced the surface pCO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; increases in both regimes (CW: +0.66 µatm yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;; TW: +1.11 µatm yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;). This growing thermodynamic gradient overwhelmingly drives an increasingly negative flux anomaly (−0.182 mmol m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt; d&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;), statistically intensifying the CW carbon sink. Crucially, recognizing the TW as a weak net source (+0.50 Tg C yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) rather than a sink reveals that conventional models overestimate ECS carbon uptake by ~46% (~4.04 Tg C yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;). Ultimately, this study provides a highly refined long-term carbon budget for the ECS, demonstrating that accounting for spatial heterogeneity is key to accurately assessing coastal carbon dynamics.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-28T04:30:04Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.3389/fmars.2026.1951665.s001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Estimating_surface_pCO2_and_its_long-term_variability_in_the_East_China_Sea_using_machine_learning_with_satellite_data_pdf/34008294</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
