2026-10-11T16:50:31Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/34001360 2026-09-25T20:20:34Z category_7 category_21 category_45 category_734 category_811 category_64 category_106 category_132 portal_5 item_type_3 month_year_09_2026

<p>Operational comparison table summarising the practical differences between the two delivery strategies.</p> Felix Lankester (329535) Ahmed Lugelo (687112) Joel Changalucha (3213042) Danni Anderson (21246844) Christian Tetteh Duamor (4604152) Anna Czupryna (833316) Kennedy Lushasi (3213054) Elaine Ferguson (3490400) Emmanuel S. Swai (7431770) Maganga Sambo (481114) Jonathan Yoder (687114) Sarah Cleaveland (83792) Sally Wyke (3408131) Benezeth Lutege Malinda (25112069) Paul C. D. Johnson (9543637) Katie Hampson (110989) Medicine Biotechnology Sociology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified Cancer Science Policy Infectious Diseases saharan african countries local teams travelling global &# 8216 approach could play 55 %; 95 37 %; 95 30 &# 8217 28 &# 8211 000 people die mass dog vaccination agroecological settings requires mediated rabies deaths canine rabies vaccine although direct evidence 60 %) compared based delivery needed based delivery ). xlink "> community national elimination strategies end dog settings typical compared using rabies elimination rabies annually prevent rabies 65 %) 61 %) based delivery wards (< randomly assigned n </ many sub led initiatives herd immunity different sociocultural confidence interval 46 %). 18 %). <p>Operational comparison table summarising the practical differences between the two delivery strategies.</p> 2026-09-25T17:54:51Z Dataset Dataset 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014704.t001 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Operational_comparison_table_summarising_the_practical_differences_between_the_two_delivery_strategies_p_/34001360 CC BY 4.0