2026-10-12T01:48:35Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/34000440 2026-09-25T17:55:21Z category_21 category_272 category_734 category_931 category_811 portal_5 item_type_3 month_year_09_2026

<p>Model selection comparison results of ModelAL to ModelDO. Results are summarized using AABC-estimated parameter values for both models, the BIC score and sum of squared errors (SSE) for each model, and the difference of BIC scores. This is done for the ten ground truth samples chosen in Fig 2D and 2E, corresponding to the selection of C, L, and W values in the first three columns.</p> Alyssa R. Wenzel (25111698) Patrick M. Haughey (25111701) Kyle C. Nguyen (25111704) John T. Nardini (8461176) Jason M. Haugh (8681715) Kevin B. Flores (4236241) Biotechnology Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Information Systems not elsewhere classified Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified xlink "> advances source code demonstrate rich data sets provides robust descriptors individual neighboring cells enabled detailed observations collective fibroblast movement approximate bayesian computation model comparison using bayesian model selection topological data analysis spatiotemporal cellular data mechanistic insight remains bayesian information criterion based parameter inference based model selection quantify spatial features cell population dynamics mechanistic inference topological information based models model discrimination extended model spatiotemporal single spatial single spatial organization cell trajectories cell populations cell imaging significant challenge rules defining extensible framework emergent behavior computational pipeline computational framework baseline abm alignment interaction <p>Model selection comparison results of ModelAL to ModelDO. Results are summarized using AABC-estimated parameter values for both models, the BIC score and sum of squared errors (SSE) for each model, and the difference of BIC scores. This is done for the ten ground truth samples chosen in Fig 2D and 2E, corresponding to the selection of C, L, and W values in the first three columns.</p> 2026-09-25T17:58:45Z Dataset Dataset 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014801.t001 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Model_selection_comparison_results_of_ModelAL_to_ModelDO_Results_are_summarized_using_AABC-estimated_parameter_values_for_both_models_the_BIC_score_and_sum_of_squared_errors_SSE_for_each_model_and_the_difference_of_BIC_scores_This_is_don/34000440 CC BY 4.0