<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T08:16:01Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/34000096" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/34000096</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-25T17:49:02Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_45</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Multiple linear regression for eHEALS (n = 113).&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Samar Thabet Jallad (25111642)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Maysa Kassabry (25111645)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Adel Taher Takruri (25111648)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Sociology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>facilitating conditions showed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multiple linear regression</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>item adapted technology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>related perception domains</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>internet remained significant</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>2 &lt;/ sup</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>div &gt;&lt; p</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>use factors associated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>289 – 0</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>year nursing students</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>related perceptions score</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>mean eheals score</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>perceived internet skills</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>whether overall ai</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>related technology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>use comparisons</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>nursing education</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multiple testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>related perceptions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>significantly associated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>positively associated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>independently associated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>perceived usefulness</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>perceived importance</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>perceived ability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>way analyses</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>regrouped one</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>regrouped internet</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>positively correlated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>pearson correlations</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>participants completed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>level findings</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>level correlation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>intervention studies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>interpreted cautiously</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>increasingly relevant</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>health literacy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>descriptive statistics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>artificial intelligence</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>59 ),</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>34 ).</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>177 ).</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Artificial intelligence (AI) and e-health literacy are increasingly relevant to nursing education; however, the relationship between nursing students’ perceptions and acceptance of AI and their perceived ability to locate, evaluate, and apply online health information remains insufficiently examined in Palestine. This cross-sectional study examined e-health literacy, AI-related technology-acceptance perceptions, Internet-use factors associated with these constructs, and whether overall AI-related perceptions were independently associated with e-health literacy among 113 third- and fourth-year nursing students. Participants completed the 8-item eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and a 28-item adapted technology-acceptance questionnaire covering seven AI-related perception domains, with negatively worded items reverse scored where required. Descriptive statistics, regrouped one-way analyses of variance, Pearson correlations with Holm adjustment for multiple testing, and multiple linear regression were performed. The mean eHEALS score was 3.53 (SD 0.59), and the overall AI-related perceptions score was 3.35 (SD 0.34). Overall AI-related perceptions were positively correlated with eHEALS (r = 0.387, Holm-adjusted p &lt; .001). Facilitating conditions showed the largest domain-level correlation with eHEALS (r = 0.450, Holm-adjusted p &lt; .001), whereas anxiety was not significantly associated with eHEALS. After adjustment for year of study, perceived Internet skills, and perceived importance of the Internet, overall AI-related perceptions remained independently associated with eHEALS (B = 0.643, 95% CI 0.289–0.998, p &lt; .001; model R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.177). Among the regrouped Internet-use comparisons, only perceived usefulness of the Internet remained significant after Holm correction. Overall, AI-related perceptions and perceived e-health literacy were positively associated in this sample, although the cross-sectional design precludes conclusions regarding directionality or causality. Further multi-site, longitudinal, and intervention studies are warranted, and domain-level findings should be interpreted cautiously because several adapted subscales demonstrated low internal consistency.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-25T17:48:53Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pdig.0001737.t005</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Multiple_linear_regression_for_eHEALS_n_113_p_/34000096</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
