2026-10-14T03:01:00Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/33997822 2026-09-25T17:24:21Z category_7 category_12 category_15 category_16 category_19 category_21 category_734 category_931 category_122 portal_5 item_type_3 month_year_09_2026

<p>Reasons for EMP test failure documented by operators during the study. Initial calibration and anomalous eye tracking data were by far the most frequent cause of test failure. These likely reflect participants’ difficulty engaging with the test. Other issues were also mostly patient-centred, <i>e.g.</i>, inability to fixate, or ocular surface characteristics.</p> Arun J. Thirunavukarasu (18549020) Victor H. Hu (8122658) Pete R. Jones (7381718) Elliott H. Taylor (12775781) Einoti Matayan (25111111) Sia Mbishi (25111114) Edith Macha (25111117) Tara Mtuy (2806900) David P. Crabb (7381724) William Makupa (695787) Matthew J. Burton (7245212) Heiko Philippin (695786) Medicine Cell Biology Neuroscience Physiology Pharmacology Biotechnology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Information Systems not elsewhere classified Mental Health visual field using standard automated perimetry slow disease progression receive earlier care rank correlation coefficient mean deviation ≤ healthy visual field eye movement perimetry 8 %), meaning sap mean deviation div >< p participants preferred emp emp test failure 0 %) sensitivity uses eye processing failure 6 %), 232 participants 0 %) world setting unnecessary referrals triaging access tracking technology tablet computer strong evidence spearman ’ sectional study sap testing restrict access resource settings rapid assessment prove useful particular need p </ many individuals identifying eyes glaucoma triage false positives emulated triage 480 eyes 370 eyes 35 eyes 3 %). <p>Reasons for EMP test failure documented by operators during the study. Initial calibration and anomalous eye tracking data were by far the most frequent cause of test failure. These likely reflect participants’ difficulty engaging with the test. Other issues were also mostly patient-centred, <i>e.g.</i>, inability to fixate, or ocular surface characteristics.</p> 2026-09-25T17:24:09Z Dataset Dataset 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007237.t002 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Reasons_for_EMP_test_failure_documented_by_operators_during_the_study_Initial_calibration_and_anomalous_eye_tracking_data_were_by_far_the_most_frequent_cause_of_test_failure_These_likely_reflect_participants_difficulty_engaging_with_the_/33997822 CC BY 4.0