<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-07T05:19:55Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33978049" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33978049</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-30T00:27:05Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_24856</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_12</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Annie Zachariah: The use of grounded theory approaches in pharmacy practice research: A scoping review</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Annie Zachariah (18832279)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Shane Scahill (1217100)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Trudi Aspden (1218045)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Clinical pharmacy and pharmacy practice</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>grounded theory</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>qualitative</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>methadology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>pharmacy practice</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scoping review</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Background: Although grounded theory (GT) is a valuable qualitative methodology, its application within pharmacy practice research remains unclear. Objectives: To map the diverse ways in which GT has been implemented in specific areas of pharmacy practice and to thematically synthesize the key findings. &lt;br&gt;Methods: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, a scoping review was conducted using a systematic search across seven databases. &lt;br&gt;Results: From 2,225 records, 61 studies across 22 countries were included, predominantly from the United States (27.8%). Modified GT (26%) and constructivist GT (24.5%) were the most utilized approaches. Data collection mostly involved semi-structured interviews (47.5%), with NVivo (27%) being the common data analysis software. Notably, while the majority of studies focused on community pharmacy (54%), most (60.6%) did not progress to full theory development. &lt;br&gt;Discussion: Future research must prioritize methodological rigor to achieve authentic theory development.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-30T00:27:05Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Image</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Poster</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.17608/k6.auckland.33978049.v2</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/poster/The_use_of_grounded_theory_approaches_in_pharmacy_practice_research_A_scoping_review/33978049</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
