<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-13T16:06:19Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33976846" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33976846</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-23T17:47:52Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_13</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_14</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_24</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_39</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_133</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Recovery of key topological relationships in the Angiosperm Biological Dataset. Grids show the presence (green) or absence (white) of expected topological relationships recovered by each method. Rows focus on basal angiosperm relationships (not necessarily clades), as these represent the most phylogenetically contentious splits in the dataset. Relationships among eudicots and monocots were consistently recovered across all methods. Numbers of expected relationships not recovered are listed below each column.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Tanjeem Azwad Zaman (25099420)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rabib Jahin Ibn Momin (25099423)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid (3259023)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Genetics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Molecular Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Evolutionary Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Ecology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Plant Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>realistic model conditions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>provable statistical consistency</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>model conditions exceeding</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>incomplete lineage sorting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gene tree heterogeneity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>rooted gene trees</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>based method astral</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ils ), presents</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>extensive empirical analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gene tree rooting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>widely used quartet</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gene tree</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>extensive research</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>empirical datasets</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>rooting techniques</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>based methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>systematics community</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>significant challenge</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>potential utility</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>largely due</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>induced triplets</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>greatly understudied</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>generally robust</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>across simulated</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Recovery of key topological relationships in the Angiosperm Biological Dataset. Grids show the presence (green) or absence (white) of expected topological relationships recovered by each method. Rows focus on basal angiosperm relationships (not necessarily clades), as these represent the most phylogenetically contentious splits in the dataset. Relationships among eudicots and monocots were consistently recovered across all methods. Numbers of expected relationships not recovered are listed below each column.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-23T18:06:49Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014782.t003</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Recovery_of_key_topological_relationships_in_the_Angiosperm_Biological_Dataset_Grids_show_the_presence_green_or_absence_white_of_expected_topological_relationships_recovered_by_each_method_Rows_focus_on_basal_angiosperm_relationships_not/33976846</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
