<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-13T09:39:10Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33968565" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33968565</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-22T18:20:58Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_146</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_7</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_15</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_873</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_45</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_811</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_63</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Does Your Self-Consistent Field Program Know How Wrong
It Is? Introducing Quantum Chemistry Uncertainty Propagation</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Anna Diaz Farias (25091403)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Shalith C. Jayasekara (25091406)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Jonathan M. Waldrop (5367062)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Eric Weber (2378128)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Theresa L. Windus (1425502)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ryan M. Richard (1299108)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Space Science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Medicine</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Neuroscience</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Sociology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>establish significant figures</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>analytic error bars</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>affine forms improve</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ab initio &lt;/</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scf estimates uncertainty</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>incomplete scf convergence</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>full iterative self</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>wave function</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>systems tested</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>point arithmetic</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>numerical approximations</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>mol compared</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>interval bounds</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gaussian screening</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>first end</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>first applied</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>direct approach</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>consistent field</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>also show</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Quantum chemistry
relies on numerical approximations. Establishing
the correctness and limits of these approximations traditionally requires
laborious benchmarking. We introduce a more direct approach, quantum
chemistry uncertainty propagation (QCUP), and apply it to a full iterative
self-consistent field (SCF) calculation. QCUP-SCF estimates uncertainty
from floating-point arithmetic, primitive-Gaussian screening, and
incomplete SCF convergence, and propagates it to the final energy
and density. Across all systems tested, predictions are typically
within 1 kcal/mol compared to analytic error bars and within an order
of magnitude of the true error  enough to establish significant
figures and support runtime decision making. We also show how thresholded-affine
forms improve on interval bounds by exploiting guaranteed error cancellation.
This is, to our knowledge, the first end-to-end forward uncertainty
quantification demonstration for an iterative &lt;i&gt;ab initio&lt;/i&gt; method, and the first applied to both energy and wave function.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1021/acs.jpclett.6c02837.s002</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Does_Your_Self-Consistent_Field_Program_Know_How_Wrong_It_Is_Introducing_Quantum_Chemistry_Uncertainty_Propagation/33968565</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
