2026-10-12T11:45:32Z
https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai
oai:figshare.com:article/33967931
2026-09-22T17:39:04Z
category_15
category_16
category_21
category_122
portal_5
item_type_3
month_year_09_2026
<p>Anonymized dataset underlying the study findings.</p>
Koray Samet Altınçekiç (25091315)
Şevval Çelen (25091318)
Osman Coşkun (25091321)
Sinan Avcı (25091324)
Selin Biçer Baikoğlu (25091327)
Meltem Özağır (25091330)
Suzan Dal (25091333)
Orkun Akkoç (25091336)
Neuroscience
Physiology
Biotechnology
Mental Health
five valid trials
extended bootstrap estimates
evaluated using 5
assessed using ancova
accelerated bootstrap replicates
test reaction time
extended nonlinear baseline
control comparison depended
baseline reaction time
lower adjusted post
different foam rolling
dependent acute effects
group randomized trial
based (&# 8722
xlink "> fr
xlink ">
foam rolling
adjusted post
acute effects
control group
test differences
group interaction
control difference
&# 8722
u18 players
trial score
study examined
sensitivity measures
second protocol
passive rest
lowest value
linearity assumptions
interaction model
independent benefit
based analyses
also higher
allocated equally
94 ms
86 ms
79 ms
52 ms
44 ms
36 ms
000 bias
<div>
<p>Objective</p><p>This study examined the acute effects of different foam rolling (FR) durations on dominant-hand visual reaction time in male youth basketball players.</p>
<p>Methods</p><p>In this parallel-group randomized trial, 102 U16–U18 players were allocated equally to FR-A (30 seconds per region), FR-B (60 seconds per region), or passive rest. Five valid trials were recorded before and after the intervention. The lowest value was the primary best-trial score; the mean and median were sensitivity measures. Baseline-adjusted post-test differences were assessed using ANCOVA. Because the standard best-trial ANCOVA violated slope-homogeneity and linearity assumptions, an extended nonlinear baseline-interaction model was evaluated using 5,000 bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap replicates. Mixed-design ANOVAs examined pre-to-post trajectories.</p>
<p>Results</p><p>FR-A had lower adjusted post-test reaction time than FR-B under best-trial (difference = −21.86 ms, 95% CI: −30.31 to −13.41; adjusted p < .01), mean-based (−12.36 ms, adjusted p < .01), and median-based scoring (−10.94 ms, adjusted p = .03). The FR-A–control difference was significant in the standard best-trial ANCOVA (−15.44 ms, 95% CI: −24.12 to −6.76; adjusted p < .01) and extended bootstrap comparison (−14.79 ms, adjusted p < .01), but not in mean-based (adjusted p = .33) or median-based analyses (adjusted p = .39). Extended bootstrap estimates were also higher in FR-B than in the control group (9.52 ms, adjusted p = .01). Because this model contained baseline interactions, these contrasts represented average rather than constant differences across baseline values. The time × group interaction was significant only for best-trial scoring (p < .01).</p>
<p>Conclusion</p><p>FR-A had consistently lower adjusted reaction time than FR-B across all scoring methods. However, the FR-A–control comparison depended on baseline reaction time and scoring method. Thus, the findings do not establish a scoring-independent benefit of the 30-second protocol over passive rest or support a firm practical recommendation.</p></div>
2026-09-22T17:39:01Z
Dataset
Dataset
10.1371/journal.pone.0358357.s001
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Anonymized_dataset_underlying_the_study_findings_p_/33967931
CC BY 4.0