2026-10-12T01:05:24Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/33958401 2026-09-21T17:53:50Z category_12 category_21 category_272 category_873 category_734 category_931 category_64 portal_5 item_type_3 month_year_09_2026

<p>Comparison of 38 clinical test results between the gastrointestinal tumor group and the control group.</p> Huijuan Bi (801256) Lina Yin (124546) Wenhao Fang (8881202) Jilu Shen (803786) Cell Biology Biotechnology Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Information Systems not elsewhere classified Cancer svm model showed shapley additive explanations seven core variables external prospective multi eight laboratory indicators 86 ), npv 71 ), ppv general population screening observation group (< gastrointestinal tumor screening control group ). div >< p analysis identified hct 98 ), specificity 92 ), sensitivity 87 – 0 81 – 0 78 – 0 74 – 0 52 – 0 serum cst4 levels observation group early screening tumor individuals 706 ). top contributors test set study aimed single markers significantly higher risk populations risk individuals performance evaluated patients diagnosed p </ modest specificity low specificity center validation calibration curves build models best performance advanced stages <p>Comparison of 38 clinical test results between the gastrointestinal tumor group and the control group.</p> 2026-09-21T17:53:30Z Dataset Dataset 10.1371/journal.pone.0353753.t001 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Comparison_of_38_clinical_test_results_between_the_gastrointestinal_tumor_group_and_the_control_group_p_/33958401 CC BY 4.0