<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-07T00:11:45Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33940299" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33940299</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-18T18:01:29Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_24</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_29</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_64</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_132</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_134</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Characteristics of Included Studies.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Esther Su (18699999)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Luxey Sirisegaram (16514724)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Hardeep Singh (595818)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Andrew D. Eaton (10937310)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Sarah E. P. Munce (4762143)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Paige Brown (2061895)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Carolina Navas (261582)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Stuart McKinlay (12405957)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Alice Zhabokritsky (6528932)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Kristina M. Kokorelias (8671566)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Evolutionary Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Geology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cancer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Infectious Diseases</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Virology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>search identified 2</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>participants often represent</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>lower health status</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>joanna briggs institute</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>including database searching</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>identified themes describing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>followed prisma recommendations</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>across included studies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>synthesize existing literature</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scoping reviews guided</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>lower digital literacy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>future research participation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>review synthesizes evidence</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>older adults living</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scoping review</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>older adults</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>grey literature</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>evidence screening</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>diverse participation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>digital access</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt;</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>text screening</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>study aims</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>published elsewhere</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>limited access</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>less accessible</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>inclusive recruitment</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>identify opportunities</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>highlights implications</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>findings point</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>designed interventions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>data extraction</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>clear processes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>also describe</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>accessibility throughout</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>734 records</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Introduction&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study aims to synthesize existing literature on co-design and co-creation methodologies that support older adults living with HIV and to identify opportunities and challenges for applying these approaches in geriatric HIV contexts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Methods&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A protocol for this scoping review was published elsewhere; we also describe our methods below. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for scoping reviews guided our approach, including database searching, title/abstract and full-text screening, data extraction, and analysis. We followed PRISMA recommendations for evidence screening and selection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Results&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our search identified 2,734 records from databases and no articles from grey literature. Across included studies, we identified themes describing how co-design and co-creation are used with older adults living with HIV, along with persistent challenges in implementation. Co-designed digital interventions may be less accessible for older adults who have lower digital literacy or limited access to devices or internet, and participants often represent a subset of older adults who are more able to engage in workshops or interviews or who have lower health status. Advisory committee members emphasized the importance of diverse participation and attention to accessibility throughout the process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conclusions&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This review synthesizes evidence on co-design and co-creation for older adults living with HIV and highlights implications for practice and future research participation and engagement in this population. Findings point to the need for clear processes, inclusive recruitment, and attention to digital access and support when implementing co-designed interventions in geriatric HIV care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-18T18:01:23Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0358263.t001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Characteristics_of_Included_Studies_p_/33940299</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
