<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-11T14:45:58Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33938102" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33938102</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-18T17:35:15Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_1</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_12</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_873</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_46</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_931</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Sensitivity of prediction performance (&lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, LOO-CV) to  scoring scheme. All schemes use Random Forest with physicochemical + EOM features. This sensitivity analysis is reported using the earlier LOO-CV protocol as a secondary check; the primary model comparisons reported elsewhere in this manuscript use 10-fold cross-validation repeated over 20 random seeds.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Quynh Hoa Truong (25073255)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Xuan Khanh Truong (25073258)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Biophysics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cell Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Immunology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Information Systems not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reproducible statistical pattern</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>physicochemical descriptors alone</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>numerical balance point</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>nanocarrier &amp;# 8211</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ligand conformational diversity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>effective microstates marking</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>controlled experimental manipulation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>105 gold nanoparticles</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>theoretic descriptor rather</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>theoretic descriptor (),</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sup &gt;&amp;# 8722</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>motivates prospective validation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>flexible surface ligands</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>compact form (&lt;</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>70 ), whereas</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>descriptor framework ().</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ligand conformational entropy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>electrostatic &amp;# 8211</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>2 &lt;/ sup</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>div &gt;&lt; p</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>&gt;&lt; sup</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>switching descriptor</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>framework provides</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>dataset validation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>uptake (&lt;</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>surface charge</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>bits (&lt;</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>550 ),</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>118 ),</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>r &lt;/</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>p &lt;/</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>f &lt;/</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>zeta potential</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>yet nanocarriers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>widely regarded</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>vitro datasets</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>thermodynamic entropy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>testable hypothesis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>strongly associated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>steric shielding</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>steric contributions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>primary determinant</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>positively associated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gains concentrated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>entropy regimes</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>critical threshold</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>computable basis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cellular uptake</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Sensitivity of prediction performance (&lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, LOO-CV) to  scoring scheme. All schemes use Random Forest with physicochemical + EOM features. This sensitivity analysis is reported using the earlier LOO-CV protocol as a secondary check; the primary model comparisons reported elsewhere in this manuscript use 10-fold cross-validation repeated over 20 random seeds.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-18T17:35:01Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0358239.t001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Sensitivity_of_prediction_performance_i_R_i_sup_2_sup_LOO-CV_to_scoring_scheme_All_schemes_use_Random_Forest_with_physicochemical_EOM_features_This_sensitivity_analysis_is_reported_using_the_earlier_LOO-CV_protocol_as_a_secondary_check_t/33938102</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
