<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-13T02:52:44Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33904523" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33904523</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-17T17:35:24Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_7</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_12</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_14</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Comparison between the models mentioned on CCSD. FAR, FRR, ACC denote False Acceptance Rate, False Rejection Rate, and Accuracy, respectively. The symbol “+” indicates that the higher the value is the better the model performs. The symbol “-” is the opposite.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Li Zhu (67404)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Long Tang (700109)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Huaqing Mao (8230416)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Medicine</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Cell Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Molecular Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>single biometric pattern</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>informative region automatically</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>false acceptance rate</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>extensive experiments show</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>experimental results demonstrates</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>baseline svm method</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>model &amp;# 8217</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>attention convolutional layers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>78 %, representing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>unlike signature verification</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>000 character images</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>fonts model achieves</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>channel cnns model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>general handwriting comparison</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>accuracy fluctuates widely</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>chinese character handwriting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>proposed methods extract</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multiple characters susceptible</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>handwriting comparison</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>proposed model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>model outputs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>multiple spatial</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>existing methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>channel receives</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>attention mechanisms</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>50 fonts</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>36 %,</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>proposed clasn</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>comparison feature</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>signature comparisons</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>entire signature</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>character level</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>whole sentence</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>two characters</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reduced sensitivity</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>paragraph level</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>enabling finer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>data noise</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>currently available</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>approximately 48</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>approach operates</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>analyzes text</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>alignment variations</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>additional information</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>800 users</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Comparison between the models mentioned on CCSD. FAR, FRR, ACC denote False Acceptance Rate, False Rejection Rate, and Accuracy, respectively. The symbol “+” indicates that the higher the value is the better the model performs. The symbol “-” is the opposite.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-17T17:35:09Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0353503.t002</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Comparison_between_the_models_mentioned_on_CCSD_FAR_FRR_ACC_denote_False_Acceptance_Rate_False_Rejection_Rate_and_Accuracy_respectively_The_symbol_indicates_that_the_higher_the_value_is_the_better_the_model_performs_The_symbol_-_is_the_o/33904523</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
