<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-10T19:15:24Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33866952" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33866952</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-16T17:44:37Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_13</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_15</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Dummy variable coding of categorical variables.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Laiju Du (24998838)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Zongpei Dai (19923989)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Xiaoxiao Sun (3488984)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Ming Liu (105953)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Qin Dai (177488)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Genetics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Neuroscience</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>two independent samples</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>psychological outcomes profoundly</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>hierarchical regression showed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>factor structure consisting</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>exploratory factor analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cronbach &amp;# 8217</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>confirmatory factor analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>children &amp;# 8217</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>646 participants completed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>chinese college freshmen</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>resilience may contribute</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reducing family conflict</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>family environment scale</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>davidson resilience scale</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>median ppea score</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>family conflict</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>scale validation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>family cohesion</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>chinese version</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>anxiety scale</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>xlink "&gt;</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>study aimed</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>standardized tool</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>significant predictor</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sample 1</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>risc ).</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>retest reliability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>remains understudied</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reliable instrument</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reliability testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>prevalent globally</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>positively associated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>perceived parental</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>parametric tests</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>original items</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>negatively associated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>influencing factors</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>findings highlight</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>expert consultation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>efa ),</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>cv ),</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>932 ).</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>825 ).</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>49 ).</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>16 items</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Background&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Parental educational anxiety is prevalent globally and impacts children’s psychological outcomes profoundly. However, children’s perceived parental educational anxiety (PPEA) remains understudied, and a standardized tool for PPEA is lacking. Furthermore, the level and influencing factors of PPEA among children remain unclear. This study aimed to revise the Parental Educational Anxiety Scale from a parental perspective to a child-perceived perspective and to further explore its level and influencing factors in college freshmen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Methods&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Perceived Parental Educational Anxiety Scale (PPEAS) was revised via pronoun conversion of the original items and expert consultation. Two independent samples were recruited for scale validation: Sample 1 (n = 232) for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and Sample 2 (n = 287) for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability testing. Subsequently, 646 participants completed the revised PPEAS, the Family Environment Scale-Chinese Version (FES-CV), and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Non-parametric tests and hierarchical multiple linear regressions were performed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Results&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EFA identified a three-factor structure consisting of 16 items with adequate model fit (χ²/df = 2.691, RMSEA = 0.077, TLI = 0.919, CFI = 0.932). Analyses confirmed satisfactory internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.922) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.825). The median PPEA score of Chinese college freshmen was 40 (IQR: 32, 49). Hierarchical regression showed that family conflict was positively associated with PPEA, while children’s resilience was negatively associated with PPEA. Contrary to our hypothesis, family cohesion was not a significant predictor in the final model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conclusion&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The revised PPEAS exhibits good reliability and validity, providing a reliable instrument for measuring perceived educational anxiety from the children’s perspective. The findings highlight that reducing family conflict and improving children’s resilience may contribute to lower PPEA levels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-16T17:44:31Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0358097.t001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Dummy_variable_coding_of_categorical_variables_p_/33866952</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
