<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-11T11:02:05Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33865965" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33865965</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-16T17:34:12Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_7</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_14</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_21</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Managing the four characteristic failure modes as two layers. A prompt constraint reduces each failure upstream, before it occurs; because constraints reduce but do not eliminate risk, a residual risk always remains, and downstream verification is designed to catch it. How much verification an output needs scales with its stakes (Section 4).&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Thomas Sharpton (6262145)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Edward W. Davis II (7460450)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Alexandra Alexiev (11301879)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Medicine</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Molecular Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>source repository (&lt;</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>separate topics rather</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>llm architecture produces</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>life science researchers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>large language models</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>including literature synthesis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>effective prompt design</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>common research tasks</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>life science workflows</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>risk across dimensions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>help researchers use</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>div &gt;&lt; p</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>practical risk framework</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>structured framework</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>detailed workflows</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>responsible use</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>immediate use</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>writing assistance</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>worked examples</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>unified approach</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>tools carefully</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>statistical reasoning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>researcher expertise</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>remarkable capabilities</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>reference checklists</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>particular attention</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>paper addresses</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>output verifiability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>integrated components</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>documentation practices</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>companion open</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>code generation</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>characteristic failures</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>administrative work</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Managing the four characteristic failure modes as two layers. A prompt constraint reduces each failure upstream, before it occurs; because constraints reduce but do not eliminate risk, a residual risk always remains, and downstream verification is designed to catch it. How much verification an output needs scales with its stakes (Section &lt;a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014776#sec004" target="_blank"&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-16T17:34:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014776.t002</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Managing_the_four_characteristic_failure_modes_as_two_layers_A_prompt_constraint_reduces_each_failure_upstream_before_it_occurs_because_constraints_reduce_but_do_not_eliminate_risk_a_residual_risk_always_remains_and_downstream_verificati/33865965</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
