2026-10-13T21:00:32Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/33814861 2026-09-15T18:02:30Z category_12 category_15 category_39 category_734 portal_5 item_type_2 month_year_09_2026

<p>Prey capture behavior: Manual annotation versus HMM classification.</p> Hsin-Yi Hung (227934) Abel Corver (24950344) Andrew Gordus (2522833) Cell Biology Neuroscience Ecology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified using unsupervised modeling typical temporal sequence spiders often switched increased pure fly enhanced signal detectability animals flexibly adjust induced vibration power uloborus diversus </ static phases marked borne vibration sensing scale behavioral tracking highest vibrational amplitude dynamic feedback loop div >< p active sampling strategy dynamic vibration active sensing active phases scale displacements loop control drosophila </ behavioral choices based strategy web radius vibratory stimulus vibrations weakened somatosensory systems sensorimotor transformations resolving micrometer real time prey localization prey interactions flies tended findings reveal extensively studied combined high <p>UMAP comparison of manually annotated prey capture sequences and behavioral states identified by the HMM framework.</p> <p>(MP4)</p> 2026-09-15T18:08:19Z Dataset Media 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014802.s007 https://figshare.com/articles/media/_p_Prey_capture_behavior_Manual_annotation_versus_HMM_classification_UMAP_comparison_of_manually_annotated_prey_capture_sequences_and_behavioral_states_identified_by_the_HMM_framework_p_/33814861 CC BY 4.0