<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-12T11:21:38Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33814515" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33814515</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-15T17:58:47Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_146</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_811</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_5</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;p&gt;Comparative summary of existing XAI methods and the proposed hybrid framework.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Arul Selvam P. (24950178)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Tamije Selvy P. (24950181)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Space Science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>positioning hybrid xai</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>outperform existing baselines</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>deletion metrics across</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>consistent evaluation protocol</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>aligning methodological rigor</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>additional computational overhead</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>15 &amp;# 8211</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>unlike prior single</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>intuitive reasoning paths</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>aware design indicating</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>hybrid explainability framework</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>framework provides explanations</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>benchmark datasets using</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>benchmark datasets</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>single techniques</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>causal reasoning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>aware pipeline</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>proposed framework</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>trust ratings</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>technically faithful</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>systematically evaluated</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>study advances</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>specific corpora</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sentiment analysis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>results show</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>representative architectures</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>remain opaque</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>regulatory demands</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>question answering</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>practical applications</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>potential suitability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>paper introduces</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>method pipeline</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>method approaches</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>main contributions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>llama ).</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>limiting adoption</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>introducing less</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>intelligent systems</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>integrates saliency</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>explainable ai</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ensuring objective</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>demand accountability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>comparable assessment</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>centered visualization</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>case studies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>bridging trust</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>based methods</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>based attribution</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>achieve state</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Comparative summary of existing XAI methods and the proposed hybrid framework.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-15T17:58:37Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1371/journal.pone.0343472.t001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_p_Comparative_summary_of_existing_XAI_methods_and_the_proposed_hybrid_framework_p_/33814515</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
