2026-10-12T09:03:01Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/33727783 2026-09-14T09:58:20Z portal_1197 item_type_3 month_year_09_2026

Data for Bimetallic MOFs (H3O)x[Cu(MF6)(pyrazine)2]·(4-x)H2O (M = V4+, x = 0; M = Ga3+, x = 1) : co-existence of ordered and disordered quantum spins in the V4+ system Jamie L. Manson (1409152) J. A. Schlueter (2355952) Kerry E. Garrett (4263805) Paul Goddard (564595) Tom Lancaster (1422454) Johannes S. Möller (24865819) Stephen Blundell (24817426) Andrew J. Steele (614632) Isabel Franke (2112223) Francis L. Pratt (1422478) John Singleton (1411675) Jesper Bendix (1319499) Saul H. Lapidus (1453873) M. Uhlarz (24750958) Oscar Ayala-Valenzuela (24874534) Ross D. McDonald (2185438) Mary Gurak (24874537) Christopher Baines (575592) Magnetic materials Ligands Metal ions Migrated from ePrints The title compounds are bimetallic MOFs containing [Cu(pyz)2]2+ square lattices linked by MF6n- octahedra. In each, only the Cu2+ spins exhibit long-range magnetic order below 3.5 K (M = V4+) and 2.6 K (M = Ga3+). The V4+ spins remain disordered down to 0.5 K.<br><br>(H3O)x[Cu(MF6)(pyrazine)2]·(4 − x)H2O Compound 1: M = V4+, x = 0 Compound 2: M = Ga3+, x = 1 file1 compound 1 magnetization (arb. units) vs magnetic field (tesla) taken at T = 0.5 kelvin see Figure 2(b) file 2 compound 1magnetic susceptibility (emu) vs temperature taken at B = 0.1 tesla mass = 46.3 mg see Figure 2(a) file 3 compound 2 magnetization (arb. units) vs magnetic field (tesla) taken at T = 0.5 kelvin see Figure 2(b) file musr_1.dat Compound 1 muSR precession frequency versus temperature (using columns 4 and 9). See Figure 4 file musr_2.dat Compound 2 muSR Gaussian relaxation rate versus temperature (using columns 4 and 7). See Figure 4 2026-09-14T09:58:20Z Dataset Dataset 10.82444/warw.33727783.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_for_Bimetallic_MOFs_H3O_x_Cu_MF6_pyrazine_2_4-x_H2O_M_V4_x_0_M_Ga3_x_1_co-existence_of_ordered_and_disordered_quantum_spins_in_the_V4_system/33727783 CC BY 4.0