<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-07T17:29:13Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33717517" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33717517</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-14T04:25:34Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_173</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_316</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Table 1_Designing for self-regulation: development and preliminary user evaluation of a student-facing learning analytics app in blended higher education.docx</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Karla Lobos (24867490)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Rubia Cobo-Rendón (10538816)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>César Mora (10478426)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Nelson Arias (24867493)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Carolyn Fernández (24867496)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Camilo Abrigo (24867499)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Applied Psychology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>blended learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>learning analytics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>self-regulated learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>technology acceptance</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Background&lt;p&gt;Blended learning environments place substantial demands on students’ capacity to plan, monitor, and evaluate their own academic work, yet most technology-mediated interventions in higher education prioritize instructor-led monitoring over student-centered autonomy.&lt;/p&gt;Objectives&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to characterize the challenges and self-regulated learning strategies of university students in blended learning contexts, design and validate a student-oriented learning analytics application natively integrated into a learning management system and explore the perceived experience and technological acceptability.&lt;/p&gt;Design&lt;p&gt;An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Participants: The qualitative phase included semi-structured interviews with 14 faculty members and 19 focus groups with 140 students (mean age = 21.53, SD = 2.87) from three Chilean universities, complemented by expert review conducted by seven specialists in educational technology; the quantitative phase involved two successive, non-equivalent pilot implementations with 5 faculty and 267 students enrolled in first-year high-risk courses. A 20-item Likert-type scale incorporating elements on self-regulation of learning and the Technology Acceptance Model was administered after each implementation. Qualitative data were analyzed through qualitative content analysis with inductive orientation; quantitative data were examined descriptively, with no inferential comparisons between pilots given differences in sample size and context.&lt;/p&gt;Results&lt;p&gt;Five overarching challenge domains were identified alongside four student strategy clusters. The final application, comprising seven interfaces aligned with Zimmerman’s three-phase model of self-regulated learning, received descriptively higher perceived impact ratings in the final pilot (forethought: M = 4.0–4.8; performance: M = 3.7–4.4; self-reflection: M = 3.7–4.4) than the preliminary version (all dimensions M = 2.2–3.0), with higher perceived usefulness (M = 4.1) and perceived ease of use (M = 3.8) than in the preliminary version.&lt;/p&gt;Conclusion&lt;p&gt;These exploratory findings suggest that student-facing learning analytics, when embedded within institutional virtual classrooms, may be associated with higher perceived support for self-regulatory processes across all three phases of the model, positioning students as active agents in interpreting their own learning data rather than passive subjects of instructor-facing monitoring systems. These findings should be considered preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-14T04:25:34Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1914516.s001</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Designing_for_self-regulation_development_and_preliminary_user_evaluation_of_a_student-facing_learning_analytics_app_in_blended_higher_education_docx/33717517</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
