<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T03:27:10Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33684919" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33684919</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-22T08:29:27Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_26071</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;b&gt;Beyond Tools: A Multi-Stakeholder Examination of Generative AI Affordances and Tensions in Creative Learning Environments&lt;/b&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Lulu Jiang (24724717)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>政凯 尹 (24107544)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Creative arts, media and communication curriculum and pedagogy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>GenerativeAI</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>creative learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>affordances</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>pedagogical tensions</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>human–AI collaboration</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>film education</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;In practice-based disciplines, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is gradually transforming creative learning settings. This embedded mixed-methods study explores how GenAI is viewed, negotiated, and integrated across creative learning activities using film education as a sample case. The study integrates quantitative and qualitative content analysis based on 1,093 survey responses from students, instructors, industry practitioners, and AI engineers. Three main trends emerge from the findings: a cognition-practice gap between awareness and actual use; ongoing pedagogical conflicts about creativity, authorship, and ethical responsibility; and a move away from tool-based use and toward ecosystem-oriented expectations for interactive and collaborative learning. The study conceptualises GenAI as a sociotechnical infrastructure that reconfigures human-AI collaboration, creative workflows, and pedagogical interaction in creative learning environments, with film education providing the empirical context, rather than framing it only as an instructional technology. By offering an affordance-tension viewpoint for comprehending the negotiated integration of AI in creative learning settings, the paper adds to the ongoing discussions on the future of generative AI in education.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-22T08:29:27Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.6084/m9.figshare.33684919.v4</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_b_Beyond_Tools_A_Multi-Stakeholder_Examination_of_Generative_AI_Affordances_and_Tensions_in_Creative_Learning_Environments_b_/33684919</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
