<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-09T19:27:16Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33684514" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33684514</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-13T02:38:39Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_25906</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>&lt;b&gt;Article: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Physical controls on dissolved N₂/Ar supersaturation in a windy estuary&lt;/b&gt;</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Zhihao Zhang (22996507)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Physical oceanography</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>bubble break-up</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>gas exchange pattern</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract: &lt;/b&gt;The ΔN₂/Ar method assumes physical perturbations to N₂ and Ar are synchronous, isolating biological N₂. In high-wind estuaries, however, bubble-mediated exchange diverges markedly among gases due to differences in solubility and partial pressure. Using winter observations in the Changjiang Estuary and a size-fractionated bubble model, we quantified air–sea exchange of N₂, O₂, and Ar. Small bubbles injected N₂ (1.92–14.45 mmol m⁻² d⁻¹) while large bubbles drove degassing (−24.06 to −4.21 mmol m⁻² d⁻¹). After correction, surface ΔN₂′ remained positive (10.38–18.64 μM), ΔO₂′ was 3.15–5.96 μM, and Ar stayed near equilibrium. Bubble-induced concentration offsets represented cumulative physical states accounting for one-third to one-half of observed surface ΔN₂, whereas instantaneous net fluxes reflected N₂ efflux at sampling. δ¹⁵N-N₂ correlated weakly with ΔN₂′, indicating atmospheric dominance. These findings provide a physical baseline for correcting nitrogen loss fluxes and demonstrate that a unified bubble framework constrains physical perturbations of N₂, O₂, and Ar.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-13T02:38:39Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.6084/m9.figshare.33684514.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_b_Article_b_b_Physical_controls_on_dissolved_N_Ar_supersaturation_in_a_windy_estuary_b_/33684514</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
