2026-10-14T22:19:52Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/33662218 2026-09-12T10:57:48Z category_7 category_45 category_734 category_106 category_122 portal_87 item_type_3 month_year_09_2026

Beyond unstructured use: scaffolded integration of generative AI in assessment for learning Darryl Cochrane (24830488) Simin Littschwager (24830491) Elaine Tsang (24830494) Ying Jin (107917) Medicine Sociology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Science Policy Mental Health Generative artificial intelligence assessment for learning evaluative judgement higher education assessment design Social Sciences Education Development Studies, Environment, Social Work, Urban Studies Criminology and Criminal Justice <p>This study examined how scaffolded integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) within an assessment task influenced students’ experience, evaluative engagement, learning, confidence, and competence. A cross-sectional quantitative survey was completed by 164 first-year undergraduate students in a fully online health communication course. The assessment required students to generate, critically evaluate, and revise GenAI-assisted outputs, and reflect on their use. The questionnaire comprised Likert-scale and multiple-response items assessing students’ experiences, learning, confidence, competence, challenges, and perceived skill development. Composite scales were analysed descriptively and compared against neutral midpoints using non-parametric tests. Students reported positive technical experiences (64%) and learning benefits, particularly in critique writing (67%), critical thinking (83%), and responsible GenAI use (82%). Evaluative skills, including critical appraisal (71%) and source verification (69%), were frequently reported. Perceptions of reliability were cautious, and confidence and competence did not differ from neutral. Composite analyses indicated positive experience and learning without corresponding increases in confidence. Scaffolded integration of GenAI within assessment can support assessment for learning by promoting evaluative engagement and critical AI literacy without encouraging uncritical reliance. These findings position assessment design as a central mechanism for guiding responsible and effective GenAI use in higher education.</p> <p>This study shows that structured integration of GenAI within assessment can support critical thinking, evaluative judgement and responsible AI use without encouraging uncritical reliance. By requiring students to evaluate and revise GenAI-generated content rather than simply use it to complete tasks, the findings demonstrate how assessment design can provide a practical mechanism for developing critical GenAI literacy in higher education.</p> 2026-09-12T10:57:48Z Dataset Dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.33662218.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Beyond_unstructured_use_scaffolded_integration_of_generative_AI_in_assessment_for_learning/33662218 CC BY 4.0