<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-09T19:52:04Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33407779" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33407779</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-24T15:35:16Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_26107</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_669</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Hidden Benefits Dataset</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Eleanor Graham (7264334)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Science, technology and engineering curriculum and pedagogy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>live project briefs</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>active learning</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>constructivism</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>self-determination theory</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>research methods teaching</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>group work</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>industry partnerships</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>student engagement</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;This paper examines how live project briefs—industry-sponsored assignments embedded in undergraduate modules—address two persistent problems in higher education: disengagement from research methods teaching and resistance to group work. Drawing on constructivist learning theory and self-determination theory (SDT), the study analyses a redesigned second-year Research Methods module in forensic science at a UK post-92 university, using module evaluation data from 2021–2025 alongside qualitative student feedback and employer perspectives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Findings show substantial improvements: intellectual stimulation ratings rose from 2.20–3.00 under traditional teaching to 3.80 after live briefs were introduced, and collaboration scores exceeded departmental benchmarks (4.70–4.89). Students who previously found research methods boring described it as relevant and engaging, while group work issues like free-riding and coordination problems diminished markedly. The authors attribute these shifts to the briefs satisfying autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs through authentic employer challenges, just-in-time teaching, and genuine team interdependence. Employer partners also reported unexpected value, expressing interest in developing student work further—pointing to benefits beyond student learning alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;The paper concludes by proposing seven evidence-informed design principles for embedding live briefs in research methods modules, positioning theoretically grounded live projects as multi-dimensional interventions that boost motivation, improve collaboration, and open new university–industry research pathways.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-24T15:35:16Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.25398/rd.northumbria.33407779.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Hidden_Benefits_Dataset/33407779</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
