<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-12T04:33:20Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33406687" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33406687</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-30T18:32:34Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_34421</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_231</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_8</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>The Red Sea Response: A Time-Series Analysis of Coalition Intervention Against the Houthis</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Buckley DeJardin (24688269)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Defence studies</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Houthis</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>asymmetric conflict</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>counterterrorism</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Red Sea</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>operation poseidon archer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>non-state actors</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>drone warfare</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;This paper evaluates the effectiveness of U.S.-led coalition operations under OPERATION POSEIDON ARCHER in countering Houthi attacks in the Red Sea. Using incident-level data from coalition strike reports and maritime attack logs, the study applies time-series generalized linear models to assess how coalition activity influences both the frequency and success of Houthi operations. The analysis reveals a heterogeneous temporal effect: coalition strikes are associated with a short-term increase in Houthi attack activity followed by a longer-term decrease in attack frequency, suggesting partial degradation of operational capacity. However, coalition operations do not produce a meaningful reduction in attack success rates, indicating that while attacks become less frequent, they remain similarly effective.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further analysis of weapon systems shows that Houthi attacks relying on ballistic missiles and drones, especially used in conjunction, are the most operationally effective, highlighting the strategic advantages of low-cost, precision-guided technologies in asymmetric warfare. These findings suggest that kinetic, strike-based counterterrorism strategies alone are insufficient to achieve sustained deterrence against adaptive non-state actors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The paper concludes that effective counterterrorism policy should integrate proactive targeting, disruption of supply networks, and non-military measures such as humanitarian and stabilization efforts. More broadly, the results contribute to understanding the evolving dynamics of asymmetric conflict, where technological accessibility and strategic adaptation increasingly favor non-state actors despite sustained military pressure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-04-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.1184/R1/33406687.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/The_Red_Sea_Response_A_Time-Series_Analysis_of_Coalition_Intervention_Against_the_Houthis/33406687</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 3.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
