<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T18:49:59Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33360408" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33360408</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-30T12:00:25Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_29725</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_921</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_11</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Repatriation and de-territorialization: Meskhetian Turks' conception of home</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Forced Migration Online (24276783)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Migration, asylum and refugee law</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>FORCED MIGRATION ONLINE</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>TURKISH MINORITIES</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>GEORGIANS</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>UZBEKS</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>USSR NATIONALS</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>FORCED RELOCATION</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>NATIONALITY</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>LAND TENURE</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>RESIDENCE</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>RESETTLEMENT</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>REPATRIATION</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>FIELD RESEARCH</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This article examines Meskhetian Turk refugees' conception of home as a way of investigating repatriation. Repatriation is considered ideologically and in policy making to be the preferred 'durable' solution for refugees: displaced people should go 'home', to their country or place of origin. Using the work of legal theorists and refugee studies scholars, the article analyses the theorizations associated with home and belonging. Ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Azerbaijan presents evidence of the disjuncture between Meskhetian Turk refugees' idea of home as they articulate it, and the conventional understanding of the idea of home in much of the theory and policy about place, belonging and the nation. Secondly, the article addresses the ability of the human rights regime or its regional manifestation to protect and represent refugee rights. This problem revolves around sovereignty. What has happened to sovereignty as a result of globalization processes contesting control functions of the state? It is concluded that the Meskhetian Turk refugees possess an account of community that runs against the grain of the meta-narrative of nation, which remains geographically bound. Though interrupted by the intervention of certain international bodies such as the European Union's Council on Minorities, sovereignty is not overcome.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-30T12:00:25Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Online resource</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.25446/oxford.33360408.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/online_resource/Repatriation_and_de-territorialization_Meskhetian_Turks_conception_of_home/33360408</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
