<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T00:17:42Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/33358911" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/33358911</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-30T11:57:40Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_29725</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_921</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_11</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Veterinary services in the Horn of Africa: where are we now? A review of animal health policies and institutions focussing in pastoral areas</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Forced Migration Online (24276783)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Migration, asylum and refugee law</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>FORCED MIGRATION ONLINE</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ANIMAL HUSBANDRY</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>LIVESTOCK</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>ANIMAL HEALTH</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>COMMUITY HEALTH WORKERS</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>GOVERNMENT POLICY</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>DEVELOPMENT</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>CASE STUDIES</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>LIVELIHOODS</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>This report is based on a study of public and private sector veterinary provision, including Community-based Animal Health, in the Greater Horn of Africa (GHA). Study findings were to inform possibilities for policy and legislative tasks to be supported by CAPE. Findings show that all governments in the GHA are making distinctions between public and private sector provision; all are involved in the devolutionary processes; all are concerned to increase livestock exports, and all are under pressure to reduce poverty. Findings also show that specific country histories have shaped different national responses to global trends and internal pressures, with public sector provision predominant in some countries while NGO and UN provision is predominant in other regions.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-30T11:57:40Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Online resource</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.25446/oxford.33358911.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/online_resource/Veterinary_services_in_the_Horn_of_Africa_where_are_we_now_A_review_of_animal_health_policies_and_institutions_focussing_in_pastoral_areas/33358911</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
