<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-09-19T05:27:34Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/32219961" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/32219961</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-05-11T07:13:24Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>portal_1132</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_8</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_05_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Optimisation of analytical methods for monitoring  monoclonal antibody therapy in Inflammatory Bowel  Disease</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Rachel Nice (21040325)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>IBD</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Crohn's</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>UC</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Infliximab</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>adalimumab</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>TDM</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). 
These chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract can be successfully 
treated with the monoclonal antibody therapies Infliximab and adalimumab. However, low 
drug levels and immunogenicity (development of anti-drug antibodies) are associated with 
treatment failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring, using drug and anti-drug antibody 
measurements improves treatment outcomes. This thesis aims to optimise and understand 
the limitations of the most used assays for therapeutic drug monitoring of monoclonal 
antibody therapy in IBD. 
In Chapter 1 I determine lower positivity thresholds for the IDKmonitor® total infliximab and 
adalimumab antibodies; 9 and 6 AU/mL compared to the manufacturer’s threshold of 
10AU/mL. Adalimumab drug levels were lower in the newly classified antibody positive group 
(median 8.1, interquartile range [IQR] 5.5-11.0 mg/L) compared to those below it (≤5AU/mL) 
(median 9.9, IQR 7.1-13.0 mg/L; P &lt; 0.0001). These reclassified antibody-positive 
individuals were also more likely to be in primary non-response (25/68 [37%] vs. 64/332 
[19%], P = 0.0035), and non-remission at week 54 (51/62 [82%] vs. 168/279 [60%], P = 
0.0011). No differences were observed lowering the anti-infliximab threshold. This indicates 
that it is appropriate to lower the positivity threshold of the IDKmonitor® total adalimumab to 
6AU/mL and this may give an earlier indication of clinically relevant immunogenicity.  
In Chapter 2 I found that pre-existing antibodies to infliximab and adalimumab in treatment 
naïve individuals are common 7.3% [95% CI 6.1 - 8.8] (112/1525), but do not neutralise drug 
activity in vitro, promote drug clearance or influence subsequent treatment response. This 
indicates that pre-existing antibodies are ‘false positives’ caused by analytical interference. 
3 
In Chapter 3 I found no evidence of anti-hinge antibody interference, confirmed that pre
existing antibodies are not drug-specific and were not detected when using the drug 
sensitive IDKmonitor® ‘free’ antibody assay indicating that the false positive signal observed 
is related to the specific formulation of the ‘total’ assay.  
In Chapter 4 I demonstrate that patient-led capillary blood sampling has potential as a key 
adjunct to telemedicine for remote patient monitoring, offering a safe, reliable, convenient 
alternative to conventional venepuncture. I demonstrate equivalence and acceptability of 
capillary blood sampling compared to venepuncture for drug and anti-drug antibody testing. 
More than 87% [90/103] of patients stated intracapillary testing was easy and 69% [71/103] 
preferred it to conventional venepuncture.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-05-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10779/exe.32219961.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Optimisation_of_analytical_methods_for_monitoring_monoclonal_antibody_therapy_in_Inflammatory_Bowel_Disease/32219961</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
