<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-14T06:29:49Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/31323919" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/31323919</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-25T09:03:30Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_23908</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_23881</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_753</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>Effect of variables on Good Agricultural Practice outcome and Response-Inducing Sustainability Evaluation correlation</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Tania Blignaut (23178106)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Environmental studies in animal production</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Sustainable agricultural development</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Sustainability</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Dairy production</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Dairy Standard Agency (DSA)</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Response-Inducing Sustainability Evaluation (RISE)</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>SDG 12 Responsible consumption and production</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;This dataset examined how geographic, operational, and institutional factors—including region, feed regime, herd size, support level, and auditor—influence DSA_GAP compliance and sustainability performance on 152 dairy farms representing the four main production regions. It also compared DSA_GAP sustainability results with RISE 3.0 sustainability outcomes. Data from 152 DSA_GAP sustainability audits and 24 RISE 3.0 assessments conducted on South African dairy farms with herd sizes from 50 to over 1000 lactating cows across seven provinces, grouped into the four main milk-producing regions - Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, Northern Regions, and Western Cape- were analysed.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-09-25T09:03:30Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.25403/UPresearchdata.31323919.v1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Effect_of_variables_on_Good_Agricultural_Practice_outcome_and_Response-Inducing_Sustainability_Evaluation_correlation/31323919</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
