<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/v2/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-10-12T04:50:10Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="oai:figshare.com:article/30689014" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:figshare.com:article/30689014</identifier>
        <datestamp>2026-09-25T10:56:45Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>category_13</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_734</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_811</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_106</setSpec>
        <setSpec>category_133</setSpec>
        <setSpec>portal_87</setSpec>
        <setSpec>item_type_3</setSpec>
        <setSpec>month_year_09_2026</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"  xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>An empirical power comparison of directional goodness-of-fit tests for 2-PL IRT model under different intercept patterns</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Jinhui Xu (575158)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Jingwen Chen (489529)</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>Mark Reiser (591042)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Genetics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Science Policy</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Plant Biology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Intercept patterns</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>2-PL IRT model</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>lagrange multiplier test</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>model misspecification</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>directional goodness-of-fit testing</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>sparse data</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;This study investigates the impact of intercept patterns, including symmetric, asymmetric, zeros on the performance of Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests in two-parameter item-response theory (2-PL IRT) models, comparing it with three other directional goodness-of-fit tests on empirical Type I error rates and power. A series of simulation results show that intercept patterns significantly affect test performance, with zero intercepts yielding the highest power; LM has the best performance that excels in controlling Type I error rates and has higher empirical power. The application to fraction subtraction data confirms LM's efficacy in detecting local dependence under sparsity. The findings offer methodological insights for goodness-of-fit testing under model misspecification.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2025-11-23T14:01:23Z</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>10.6084/m9.figshare.30689014.v2</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/An_empirical_power_comparison_of_directional_goodness-of-fit_tests_for_2-PL_IRT_model_under_different_intercept_patterns/30689014</dc:relation>
          <dc:rights>CC BY 4.0</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
