2026-10-14T15:15:58Z https://api.figshare.com/v2/oai

oai:figshare.com:article/29146454 2026-09-20T22:01:36Z category_24490 category_27052 item_type_3 month_year_09_2026

Supplemental Online Content for manuscript: "Lessons in Bias: What Topical Steroid Withdrawal Studies Get Wrong" Eugene Tan (19826712) Andrew Affleck (21458356) Robert Dawe (512349) Dermatology Epidemiological methods Topical steroid bias adjust selection bias effect evidence - based medicine Guideline Adherence. <p dir="ltr">Updated 8 Sept 2026 - The latest version of Table 1 consists of expanded data extraction and an updated search to encompass TSW studies to 8 Sept 2026,</p><p dir="ltr">These two documents are supplementary files for the manuscript titled <i>"Lessons in Bias: What Topical Steroid Withdrawal Studies Get Wrong."</i></p><p dir="ltr"><br>The first document (Word format) contains the OVID search string, which mirrors that of the systematic review by Hajar T et al. (<i>J Am Acad Dermatol.</i> 2015;72(3):541–549.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.024), updated to reflect the literature up to 2025.</p><p dir="ltr"><br>The second document (Excel spreadsheet) lists all original investigations published to date. Systematic reviews and narrative reviews were excluded because they review existing case reports/series and hence risk duplicating results. Surveys are omitted because they are descriptive in nature and are not included within the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) levels of evidence, which prioritize analytical over descriptive tools.</p> 2025-06-21T18:41:37Z Dataset Dataset 10.6084/m9.figshare.29146454.v2 https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Supplemental_Online_Content_for_manuscript_Lessons_in_Bias_What_Topical_Steroid_Withdrawal_Studies_Get_Wrong_/29146454 CC BY 4.0